CAJ | 학술논문

学界和司法界对民事诉讼法关于发回重审标准的争论由来已久,主要集中在因原审裁判瑕疵是＂发＂还是＂改＂与法律适用过于弹性化的叠加导致的自由裁量权滥用现象上,由此形成了独我是好各自表达的审级诉讼冲突。期间,因人为关系投送了法律无法承载的利益期待使话题越发显得胶着和沉重,以至于剪不断理还乱。究其原因,既有立法技术问题,也有体制、机制不畅因素,还有公权私化、借案谋私倾向以及群体裁判下的错案问责缺失等,不能不说情形混迹十分复杂甚至难以名状。对此,笔者仅从主体行为归责出发以缩限法的任意性标准为目的,力图达到技术与思想双重治理的品质效果。
학계화사법계대민사소송법관우발회중심표준적쟁론유래이구,주요집중재인원심재판하자시＂발＂환시＂개＂여법률괄용과우탄성화적첩가도치적자유재량권람용현상상,유차형성료독아시호각자표체적심급소송충돌。기간,인인위관계투송료법률무법승재적이익기대사화제월발현득효착화침중,이지우전불단리환란。구기원인,기유입법기술문제,야유체제、궤제불창인소,환유공권사화、차안모사경향이급군체재판하적착안문책결실등,불능불설정형혼적십분복잡심지난이명상。대차,필자부종주체행위귀책출발이축한법적임의성표준위목적,력도체도기술여사상쌍중치리적품질효과。
Academia and the judiciary have been arguing over the standards of retrial on Civil Procedure Law for a long time, mainly concentrated on discretion abuse caused by that if trial referee flaw should be ＂ returned＂ or ＂commuted＂ and the law-application are too flexible, thus formed a conflict of judicial proceedings that they may hold the idea that they think the best one. Meanwhile, this issue seems deadlocked when interests is concerned. It is so helpless and chaotic! The reason is complicated in many aspects including legislative and institutional mechanism, sluggish factors, public rights private, self-serving tendencies and groups of referees under the wrong case of accountability missing by case, can not but say the case removed from the very complex and even unspeakable. In this regard, from the main behavior imputation, the author aims to start any standards shrinkage limit law for the purpose of trying to achieve the effects technically and morally.