CAJ | 학술논문

即便法条有规定辩护权，辩护人在强制辩护案件未必会尽力，因此台湾学说与判决发展出没有实质辩护就等于未经有效辩护的理论。然而大陆地区因为如实回答义务和律师伪证罪等规定阻碍律师为充分之辩护，为了发现案情真实及保障人权宜引进该理论。
즉편법조유규정변호권，변호인재강제변호안건미필회진력，인차태만학설여판결발전출몰유실질변호취등우미경유효변호적이론。연이대륙지구인위여실회답의무화률사위증죄등규정조애률사위충분지변호，위료발현안정진실급보장인권의인진해이론。
Abstract ： A defender does not necessarily make effort in a compulsory defense case though the law provides him the fight to defense. So Taiwan doctrine and judgment develop a theory that there＇ s no effective defense where there＇ s no substantial defense. However, in the mainland district, the obligation of truthful answer and the crime of lawyer perjury hinder the lawyers from adequate defenses. It is necessary to introduce this Taiwan theory in order to find the reality of a case and safeguard human rights.