新医学
新醫學
신의학
NEW CHINESE MEDICINE
2013年
12期
832-835
,共4页
李爱萍%肖卫民%王煜明%熊小平%黄小琼
李愛萍%肖衛民%王煜明%熊小平%黃小瓊
리애평%초위민%왕욱명%웅소평%황소경
针刺%多奈哌齐%脑梗死后失语
針刺%多奈哌齊%腦梗死後失語
침자%다내고제%뇌경사후실어
Acupuncture%Donepezil%Poststroke aphasia
目的:评价多奈哌齐联合针刺及语言康复措施治疗脑梗死后失语的疗效,探索脑梗死后失语治疗的有效措施。方法序贯入组120例脑梗死后失语患者,随机分配至单纯语言康复组(A组,29例)、多奈哌齐联合语言康复组(B 组,28例)、针刺治疗联合语言康复组(C 组,28例)、多奈哌齐联合针刺及语言康复组(D组,30例),所有患者接受为期4周的治疗,分别于治疗前、治疗12周及治疗24周末采用西方失语症成套测验(WAB)评定疗效,比较4组疗效。结果4组患者基线失语指数及各亚项(自发语言、听力理解、复述及命名)评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经重复测量资料方差分析及单因素方差分析,治疗后D组失语指数及各亚项(自发语言、听力理解、复述及命名)评分均高于其他3组,4组患者比较差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。治疗24周后,A、B、C、D组临床改善者分别占28%、50%、46%、77%,D组达临床改善者比例明显高于其他3组(P均<0.05)。结论针刺、语言康复训练及药物三种康复方式联合有助于脑梗死后失语恢复。
目的:評價多奈哌齊聯閤針刺及語言康複措施治療腦梗死後失語的療效,探索腦梗死後失語治療的有效措施。方法序貫入組120例腦梗死後失語患者,隨機分配至單純語言康複組(A組,29例)、多奈哌齊聯閤語言康複組(B 組,28例)、針刺治療聯閤語言康複組(C 組,28例)、多奈哌齊聯閤針刺及語言康複組(D組,30例),所有患者接受為期4週的治療,分彆于治療前、治療12週及治療24週末採用西方失語癥成套測驗(WAB)評定療效,比較4組療效。結果4組患者基線失語指數及各亞項(自髮語言、聽力理解、複述及命名)評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。經重複測量資料方差分析及單因素方差分析,治療後D組失語指數及各亞項(自髮語言、聽力理解、複述及命名)評分均高于其他3組,4組患者比較差異有統計學意義(P均<0.05)。治療24週後,A、B、C、D組臨床改善者分彆佔28%、50%、46%、77%,D組達臨床改善者比例明顯高于其他3組(P均<0.05)。結論針刺、語言康複訓練及藥物三種康複方式聯閤有助于腦梗死後失語恢複。
목적:평개다내고제연합침자급어언강복조시치료뇌경사후실어적료효,탐색뇌경사후실어치료적유효조시。방법서관입조120례뇌경사후실어환자,수궤분배지단순어언강복조(A조,29례)、다내고제연합어언강복조(B 조,28례)、침자치료연합어언강복조(C 조,28례)、다내고제연합침자급어언강복조(D조,30례),소유환자접수위기4주적치료,분별우치료전、치료12주급치료24주말채용서방실어증성투측험(WAB)평정료효,비교4조료효。결과4조환자기선실어지수급각아항(자발어언、은력리해、복술급명명)평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。경중복측량자료방차분석급단인소방차분석,치료후D조실어지수급각아항(자발어언、은력리해、복술급명명)평분균고우기타3조,4조환자비교차이유통계학의의(P균<0.05)。치료24주후,A、B、C、D조림상개선자분별점28%、50%、46%、77%,D조체림상개선자비례명현고우기타3조(P균<0.05)。결론침자、어언강복훈련급약물삼충강복방식연합유조우뇌경사후실어회복。
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of combining acupuncture and donepezfil in pa-tients with post-Infarction aphasia. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with acute aphasic infarct were randomly assigned into 4 groups:standard speech-language therapy group (group A),donepezil (5 mg/d)as an adjunctive treatment to standard speech-language therapy group (group B),acupuncture as an adjunctive treatment to standard speech-language therapy group (group C)and a combination of donepezil (5 mg/d), acupuncture and standard speech-language therapy group (group D). All patients underwent clinical assess-ment (western aphasia battery)three times over a 24-week period (the 1 st,1 2th,and 24th weeks)and clinical scores were analyzed. Results Compared with the baseline in each group,all items of WAB scores and Aphasia Quotien (AQ) were statistically significant (all P<0.05 ). The difference in all items of WAB scores and AQ between different groups in the 1 2th and 24th week became statistically significant. The signifi-cant improvement rate in the combination of donepezil,acupuncture and standard speech-language therapy group was 77% which was significantly greater than that of other groups (group A 27.6%,group B 50%and group C 46%,all P<0.05 ). Conclusion Acupuncture combined with donepezil has been shown to improve the poststroke aphasia.