新医学
新醫學
신의학
NEW CHINESE MEDICINE
2013年
12期
818-820
,共3页
刘德林%蒋天安%张珍东%陈立斌
劉德林%蔣天安%張珍東%陳立斌
류덕림%장천안%장진동%진립빈
射频消融%微波消融%离体%牛肝%超声
射頻消融%微波消融%離體%牛肝%超聲
사빈소융%미파소융%리체%우간%초성
Radiofrequency ablation%Microwave ablation%Vitro%Bovine liver%Ultrasonography
目的:比较射频消融与微波消融对离体牛肝的作用效果。方法实验分为射频组与微波组,分别使用Cool-tip射频针与冷循环微波刀,均采用单针单次方式消融离体牛肝,比较两组间相同消融时间消融灶纵径、横径及体积。结果消融4、6、8 min,微波组消融灶纵径及体积均大于对应时间射频组消融灶纵径及体积(P<0.05),消融10 min,两组消融灶纵径及体积差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);消融4 min,微波消融灶横径大于对应时间射频消融灶横径(P<0.05),消融6、8、10 min,两组消融灶横径差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与射频相比较,微波的热效率更高,消融速度更快,但随着消融时间延长,最终两者可取得相近的消融效果。
目的:比較射頻消融與微波消融對離體牛肝的作用效果。方法實驗分為射頻組與微波組,分彆使用Cool-tip射頻針與冷循環微波刀,均採用單針單次方式消融離體牛肝,比較兩組間相同消融時間消融竈縱徑、橫徑及體積。結果消融4、6、8 min,微波組消融竈縱徑及體積均大于對應時間射頻組消融竈縱徑及體積(P<0.05),消融10 min,兩組消融竈縱徑及體積差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);消融4 min,微波消融竈橫徑大于對應時間射頻消融竈橫徑(P<0.05),消融6、8、10 min,兩組消融竈橫徑差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論與射頻相比較,微波的熱效率更高,消融速度更快,但隨著消融時間延長,最終兩者可取得相近的消融效果。
목적:비교사빈소융여미파소융대리체우간적작용효과。방법실험분위사빈조여미파조,분별사용Cool-tip사빈침여랭순배미파도,균채용단침단차방식소융리체우간,비교량조간상동소융시간소융조종경、횡경급체적。결과소융4、6、8 min,미파조소융조종경급체적균대우대응시간사빈조소융조종경급체적(P<0.05),소융10 min,량조소융조종경급체적차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05);소융4 min,미파소융조횡경대우대응시간사빈소융조횡경(P<0.05),소융6、8、10 min,량조소융조횡경차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론여사빈상비교,미파적열효솔경고,소융속도경쾌,단수착소융시간연장,최종량자가취득상근적소융효과。
Objective To compare the effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA)and microwave abla-tion (MWA)in vitro bovine liver. Methods The experiment was divided into two groups:Group RFA and Group MWA,respectively,useing Cool-tip radiofrequency eletrode and Water-cooled microwave antenna by single-needle and single-ablation method. Ablation lesions in longitudinal diameter (LD),transverse diameter (TD)and volume (V)in the same ablation time between the two groups were analysed. Results LD and V of MWA lesions are greater than the corresponding time RFA lesions in 4 minutes,6 minutes and 8 minutes (P<0.05 ). LD and V of MWA lesions have no statistical significance with LD and V of RFA lesions in 1 0 mi-nutes (P>0.05 ). TD of MWA lesions was greater than that of RFA lesions in 4 minutes (P<0.05 ). TD of MWA lesions has no statistical significance in RFA lesions of 6 minutes,8 minutes and 1 0 minutes(P>0.05).Conclusions MWA has higher thermal efficiency and faster ablation speed than RFA. But with extension of time,both methods can achieve similar effect of ablation.