铜仁学院学报
銅仁學院學報
동인학원학보
JOURNAL OF TONGREN UNIVERSITY
2012年
3期
133-140
,共8页
田秀玲%夏婧%夏焕柏%倪健
田秀玲%夏婧%夏煥柏%倪健
전수령%하청%하환백%예건
喀斯特森林%生物量%蓄积量%时空变化
喀斯特森林%生物量%蓄積量%時空變化
객사특삼림%생물량%축적량%시공변화
Karst forest%biomass%stem volume%spatial and temporal changes
以贵州省1996年~2005年两期森林资源连续清查资料为基础,利用主要森林类型的蓄积量―生物量转换函数,估算该10年内贵州省各种林地的生物量,分析了主要森林类型分布格局和生物量的时空变化特征及其与喀斯特地貌的相关性。结果表明:1996年~2005年期间,贵州省林业用地面积净增7.68×105hm2,总生物量由2.58×108t增长到3.43×108t,10年间增加了0.85×108t,其中,喀斯特地区的林地增长和非林地减少幅度均高于非喀斯特地区。林种组成方面,防护林及特用林面积大幅增加,用材林、炭薪林等面积则急剧降低,防护林生物量在喀斯特和非喀斯特地区均大幅度提高,其他林种的生物量变化不明显。除极少数特例外,喀斯特森林的蓄积量及生物量均较非喀斯特地区低。
以貴州省1996年~2005年兩期森林資源連續清查資料為基礎,利用主要森林類型的蓄積量―生物量轉換函數,估算該10年內貴州省各種林地的生物量,分析瞭主要森林類型分佈格跼和生物量的時空變化特徵及其與喀斯特地貌的相關性。結果錶明:1996年~2005年期間,貴州省林業用地麵積淨增7.68×105hm2,總生物量由2.58×108t增長到3.43×108t,10年間增加瞭0.85×108t,其中,喀斯特地區的林地增長和非林地減少幅度均高于非喀斯特地區。林種組成方麵,防護林及特用林麵積大幅增加,用材林、炭薪林等麵積則急劇降低,防護林生物量在喀斯特和非喀斯特地區均大幅度提高,其他林種的生物量變化不明顯。除極少數特例外,喀斯特森林的蓄積量及生物量均較非喀斯特地區低。
이귀주성1996년~2005년량기삼림자원련속청사자료위기출,이용주요삼림류형적축적량―생물량전환함수,고산해10년내귀주성각충임지적생물량,분석료주요삼림류형분포격국화생물량적시공변화특정급기여객사특지모적상관성。결과표명:1996년~2005년기간,귀주성임업용지면적정증7.68×105hm2,총생물량유2.58×108t증장도3.43×108t,10년간증가료0.85×108t,기중,객사특지구적임지증장화비임지감소폭도균고우비객사특지구。림충조성방면,방호림급특용림면적대폭증가,용재림、탄신림등면적칙급극강저,방호림생물량재객사특화비객사특지구균대폭도제고,기타림충적생물량변화불명현。제겁소수특예외,객사특삼림적축적량급생물량균교비객사특지구저。
Based on the continuous forest inventory data of 1996-2000 and 2001-2005 in Guizhou Province, we estimated the biomass of different forest types in the two periods using the volume-biomass transfer function of the major forest types. Changes of forest spatial and temporal distribution and biomass in the two periods as well as their relationships with Karst landform and rocky desertification level were further analyzed. These provide the background information of productivity maintenance mechanism and adaptive the ecological restoration and desertification control in Karst areas. Results showed that between late 1990s and early 2000s, the forest land area increased 7.68×10^5hm^2. Total biomass increased from 2.58×10^8t to 3.43×10^8 t. A total increment of 0.85 billion ton was obtained during these ten years. The area of forest types was changed too. The shelter forest and special-purpose forest were substantially increased in their areas; while the area of timber forest and fuel wood forest was drastically reduced. Karst landform and rocky desertification have positive correlations with forest volume and biomass. Karst forest biomass is lower than non-Karst forests. The rocky desertification in Karst area is more serious than non-Karst area.