CAJ | 학술논문

西方翻译理论界从1953年开始流行以“对当”（Equivalent／Equivalence）为核心概念的翻译理论。“对当”误译为“对等”、“相当”误译为“相等”，此误译导致了对西方这一整个翻译理论的严重误读和曲解。翻译术语Equivalence／Equivalent应该翻译成“相当”、或“相似”、“对当”、“贴近”而非“等值”、“对等”、“对等语”。
서방번역이론계종1953년개시류행이“대당”（Equivalent／Equivalence）위핵심개념적번역이론。“대당”오역위“대등”、“상당”오역위“상등”，차오역도치료대서방저일정개번역이론적엄중오독화곡해。번역술어Equivalence／Equivalent응해번역성“상당”、혹“상사”、“대당”、“첩근”이비“등치”、“대등”、“대등어”。
The real meaning of the central term of equivalent/equivalence in the western translation theory is ＂similarity＂, which has been misread and misinterpreted as equal-value, equal-effect or identity by the translation theories. Nida＇ s translational equivalent/equivalence called dynamic equivalence means that the dynamic which makes＇ readers response in the source text must be equivalent to the dynamic which makes readers＇ response in the target text.