CAJ | 학술논문

早期基本权利研究的突出特点是模糊学科之间的范围与界限,导致相对于法学的方法偏离。基本权利释义学是一个致力于规范含义发现的解释事业,是在遵循基本权利普遍原理的前提下,参考特定学说,依据本国概念,服从宪法解释方法确定基本权利含义。基本权利释义学具有相对的中立性,一定程度上规避了政治现实。这一规避在政治与学术之间树起了一道墙,在确保政治与学术安全的同时蕴涵着双重风险,即过多借用普遍性原理或者域外理论有可能影响基本权利的本地化程度及僵化基本权利,使其成为远离政治现实的封闭体系。为克服这些风险,应促使基本权利概念的本地化,通过外弛弥补体系化的内证之不足,确立权利义务相一致为基本的解释原则。
조기기본권리연구적돌출특점시모호학과지간적범위여계한,도치상대우법학적방법편리。기본권리석의학시일개치력우규범함의발현적해석사업,시재준순기본권리보편원리적전제하,삼고특정학설,의거본국개념,복종헌법해석방법학정기본권리함의。기본권리석의학구유상대적중립성,일정정도상규피료정치현실。저일규피재정치여학술지간수기료일도장,재학보정치여학술안전적동시온함착쌍중풍험,즉과다차용보편성원리혹자역외이론유가능영향기본권리적본지화정도급강화기본권리,사기성위원리정치현실적봉폐체계。위극복저사풍험,응촉사기본권리개념적본지화,통과외이미보체계화적내증지불족,학립권리의무상일치위기본적해석원칙。
The main nature of fundamental rights research has blurred the scope and the limitation be- tween disciplines, thus resulting in the deviation from legal methodology. Interpretation of fundamental rights is focused on norm finding which follows the general theories to determine the meaning of fundamental rights by referring to some doctrines and depending on domestic constitutional concepts. Fundamental rights interpreta- tion is somewhat neutral and to some extent escapes from political reality. A wall between politic and academic action has been established which contains double risks in ensuring the safety for both politic and academic ac- tion, and borrowing much more from general theories and overseas thoughts are likely to affect the localization degree of fundamental rights, thus making it a closed system far from political reality. In order to overcome such risks, it is necessary to promote fundamental rights to be localized by remedying the shortage within sys- tem research based on using other social science methods and entrenching the ＂rights are consistent with obli- gation mutually＂ as the basic principle of interoretation.