CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨应用层次分析法确定评估体系指标权重在医院信息系统中的应用。方法在咨询专家的基础上，建立医学图像存档与传输系统（PACS）评估体系框架，应用层次分析法确定评估体系各级指标权重。结果评估体系包括一级指标5个、二级指标23个。5个一级指标中供应商综合能力、产品成熟性与先进性、系统安全性与可靠性、系统准确性和系统性能的权重分别为0.0917、0.2247、0.2326、0.1810、0.2700，各级指标权重均满足一致性检验，所得权重是可以接受的；二级指标组合权重按权重大小排序，权重最大的前5位分别是“工作站性能”“系统存储与影像存档性能”“影像质量及显示性能”“数据的完整性”和“数据安全策略”。结论应用层次分析法确定评估体系指标权重是可行、有效的。
목적：탐토응용층차분석법학정평고체계지표권중재의원신식계통중적응용。방법재자순전가적기출상，건립의학도상존당여전수계통（PACS）평고체계광가，응용층차분석법학정평고체계각급지표권중。결과평고체계포괄일급지표5개、이급지표23개。5개일급지표중공응상종합능력、산품성숙성여선진성、계통안전성여가고성、계통준학성화계통성능적권중분별위0.0917、0.2247、0.2326、0.1810、0.2700，각급지표권중균만족일치성검험，소득권중시가이접수적；이급지표조합권중안권중대소배서，권중최대적전5위분별시“공작참성능”“계통존저여영상존당성능”“영상질량급현시성능”“수거적완정성”화“수거안전책략”。결론응용층차분석법학정평고체계지표권중시가행、유효적。
Objective To establish the weight value of PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) score system by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Methods The framework of PACS score system was developed by different experts, the weights of each index were determined by AHP. Results The score system was composed with 5 ifrst-class indexes and 23 second-class indexes. The 5 ifrst-class indexs included comprehensive ability of suppliers, the products maturity and progressiveness, the security and reliability of the system, the accuracy of the system ,and the system performance, with the weights being 0.0917, 0.2247, 0.2326, 0.1810, 0.2700 respectively. The all weights of various indexes met the consistency test, and were acceptable. According to the compound weight of second-class indexes, the top 5 of second indexes were"workspace performance”“the system storage capacity and picture archiving performance”“image quality and display performance”“the integrity of system data”and“the security strategy of system data”. Conclusion AHP method is feasible and effective for establishing weight values of PACS score system.