中国介入心脏病学杂志
中國介入心髒病學雜誌
중국개입심장병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
2014年
3期
176-180
,共5页
牛和平%张军%袁琛%付金国%费玲%万艳芳%王长厚
牛和平%張軍%袁琛%付金國%費玲%萬豔芳%王長厚
우화평%장군%원침%부금국%비령%만염방%왕장후
急性心肌梗死%抽吸导管%经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
急性心肌梗死%抽吸導管%經皮冠狀動脈介入治療
급성심기경사%추흡도관%경피관상동맥개입치료
Acute myocardial infarction%Aspiration catheter angioplasty%Percutaneous coronary intervention
目的:评价Diver CE血栓抽吸导管在急性心肌梗死(AMI)恢复期介入过程中的效果。方法选择2010年1月至2011年12月间AMI恢复期血栓负荷较重患者共50例,随机分为两组,应用Diver CE血栓抽吸导管的血栓抽吸组和不应用Diver CE血栓抽吸导管的常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)组。比较两组患者基础资料、PCI相关情况及临床预后等。结果两组患者基础临床资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后血栓抽吸组血栓积分(TS)、心肌呈色分级(MBG)3级获得率、无复流及慢血流发生率低于常规对照组(P<0.05);血栓抽吸组术后6个月、12个月左心室射血分数(LVEF)均高于常规对照组(P<0.05);住院期间和术后随访期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率两组比较差异无统计学意义。结论在对血栓负荷较重的AMI恢复期患者行PCI的过程中,应用Diver CE血栓抽吸导管是安全、有效的一种方法。
目的:評價Diver CE血栓抽吸導管在急性心肌梗死(AMI)恢複期介入過程中的效果。方法選擇2010年1月至2011年12月間AMI恢複期血栓負荷較重患者共50例,隨機分為兩組,應用Diver CE血栓抽吸導管的血栓抽吸組和不應用Diver CE血栓抽吸導管的常規經皮冠狀動脈介入治療(PCI)組。比較兩組患者基礎資料、PCI相關情況及臨床預後等。結果兩組患者基礎臨床資料差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);術後血栓抽吸組血栓積分(TS)、心肌呈色分級(MBG)3級穫得率、無複流及慢血流髮生率低于常規對照組(P<0.05);血栓抽吸組術後6箇月、12箇月左心室射血分數(LVEF)均高于常規對照組(P<0.05);住院期間和術後隨訪期間主要不良心血管事件(MACE)髮生率兩組比較差異無統計學意義。結論在對血栓負荷較重的AMI恢複期患者行PCI的過程中,應用Diver CE血栓抽吸導管是安全、有效的一種方法。
목적:평개Diver CE혈전추흡도관재급성심기경사(AMI)회복기개입과정중적효과。방법선택2010년1월지2011년12월간AMI회복기혈전부하교중환자공50례,수궤분위량조,응용Diver CE혈전추흡도관적혈전추흡조화불응용Diver CE혈전추흡도관적상규경피관상동맥개입치료(PCI)조。비교량조환자기출자료、PCI상관정황급림상예후등。결과량조환자기출림상자료차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);술후혈전추흡조혈전적분(TS)、심기정색분급(MBG)3급획득솔、무복류급만혈류발생솔저우상규대조조(P<0.05);혈전추흡조술후6개월、12개월좌심실사혈분수(LVEF)균고우상규대조조(P<0.05);주원기간화술후수방기간주요불양심혈관사건(MACE)발생솔량조비교차이무통계학의의。결론재대혈전부하교중적AMI회복기환자행PCI적과정중,응용Diver CE혈전추흡도관시안전、유효적일충방법。
Objective To evaluate the effect of Diver CE aspiration thrombus catheter used in patients during the recovery of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods A total of 50 AMI patients were enrolled from January 2010 to December 2011. Twenty-ifve patients received PCI and used the Diver CE aspiration thrombus catheter (aspiration group);and the other 25 patients received routine PCI (routine PCI group). The basic characteristics, PCI characteristics, myocardial perfusion indexes and clinical data were compared and analyzed. Results There was no statistically difference between two groups in basic characteristics. Compared with the routine PCI group, higher rate of myocardial blush grade 3 but lower thrombus scores were found in the aspiration group. The incidence of no-lfow or slow-lfow were also lower in aspiration group (all P<0.05). The LVEF after 6 and 12 months were higher in the aspiration group (both P<0.05), no difference in MACE between the two groups. Conclusions Using the Diver CE thrombus aspiration in PCI is a simple and safe by method for treatment of acute myocardial infarction with high thrombosis burden. It can improve reperfusion decrease the rates of no-relfow on slow-relfow and can improve the long-term left ventricular function.