CAJ | 학술논문

类比推理作为创造性法律解释中的一种重要方法,其具体适用的妥当性很大程度上取决于裁判者对法定案型事实与待决案件的相似性判断。因此,相似性判断标准必须保证裁判结果的确定、客观和公正。这需要裁判者从不同的视野范围,以不同的态度评价规范与事实的相似性,根据不同的情况,排除主观因素的干扰,最大程度地追求司法结果的确定性,在存在与当为、方法与结果之间进行合理的反思。
류비추리작위창조성법률해석중적일충중요방법,기구체괄용적타당성흔대정도상취결우재판자대법정안형사실여대결안건적상사성판단。인차,상사성판단표준필수보증재판결과적학정、객관화공정。저수요재판자종불동적시야범위,이불동적태도평개규범여사실적상사성,근거불동적정황,배제주관인소적간우,최대정도지추구사법결과적학정성,재존재여당위、방법여결과지간진행합리적반사。
As an important method of creative interpretation of law,to a large extent the proper of specific application of analogy depends on the judge to similarity judgment of pending cases and legal cases type by justice.Therefore,the standard of similarity judgment should ensure the certain,objectivity and fair of judicial results.This requires the justice to evaluate the similarities between pending cases and legal cases from range of vision the size of which is different,in different attitudes as well as avoiding the influence of subjective elements according to different circumstances,in order to try their best to make sure the certainty of judicial result,and introspect properly between there are and when to.