天津商业大学学报
天津商業大學學報
천진상업대학학보
JOURNAL OF TIANJIN UNIVERSITY OF COMMERCE
2012年
3期
57-61
,共5页
提单%承运人%无单放货
提單%承運人%無單放貨
제단%승운인%무단방화
bills of lading%carrier%delivery goods without presentation of the original bills of lading
承运人在目的港无正本提单放行货物的行为会严重损害提单持有人的经济利益，需要承担侵权或违约责任。然而，在无单放货案件的审判实践中，承运人总会从各方面寻求解除其责任的理由，给提单持有人权利的维护带来诸多障碍。本文通过分析典型案例，总结承运人在无单放货案例中常用的抗辩理由，进而提出相应的无单放货风险防范措施。
承運人在目的港無正本提單放行貨物的行為會嚴重損害提單持有人的經濟利益，需要承擔侵權或違約責任。然而，在無單放貨案件的審判實踐中，承運人總會從各方麵尋求解除其責任的理由，給提單持有人權利的維護帶來諸多障礙。本文通過分析典型案例，總結承運人在無單放貨案例中常用的抗辯理由，進而提齣相應的無單放貨風險防範措施。
승운인재목적항무정본제단방행화물적행위회엄중손해제단지유인적경제이익，수요승담침권혹위약책임。연이，재무단방화안건적심판실천중，승운인총회종각방면심구해제기책임적이유，급제단지유인권리적유호대래제다장애。본문통과분석전형안례，총결승운인재무단방화안례중상용적항변이유，진이제출상응적무단방화풍험방범조시。
Delivery goods without presentation of the original bills of lading at the port of destination will seriously damage the bill of lading holder＇ s economic interests. The carrier needs to assume tort liability or liability for the breach of contact. However, in the judicial practice, the carrier will always find a variety of justifications for exemption from the l!ability. These justifications become main obstacles for the bill of lading holders in the lawsuit. This paper puts forward the corresponding preventive measures through analyzing carrier＇ s justifications in typical cases about delivery goods without presentation of the original bills of lading.
