中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2013年
24期
188-189
,共2页
改良腹膜外剖宫产术%改良子宫下段剖宫产%先兆临产
改良腹膜外剖宮產術%改良子宮下段剖宮產%先兆臨產
개량복막외부궁산술%개량자궁하단부궁산%선조임산
Modified extraperitoneal cesarean section%Modified lower uterine segment cesarean section%Threatened labor
目的:探讨改良式腹膜外剖宫产术与改良式子宫下段剖宫产术的术后情况。方法对2009年1月~2012年12月河南省登封市中医院行两种术式剖宫产的患者,进行回顾性分析,比较其手术时间、术后情况。结果观察组和对照组体温升高再恢复至正常时间分别为(18.8±2.6)h、(20.6±3.0)h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);通气时间分别为(16.25±9.25)h、(22.32±10.50)h,显著缩短(P<0.01);术后外周血白细胞计数分别为(6.5±1.6)×109/L、(7.1±2.3)×109/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后镇痛药物应用比例分别为20(20%)、60(60%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论改良式腹膜外剖宫产术术后情况优于改良式子宫下段剖宫产术,改良式腹膜外剖宫产术值得推广。
目的:探討改良式腹膜外剖宮產術與改良式子宮下段剖宮產術的術後情況。方法對2009年1月~2012年12月河南省登封市中醫院行兩種術式剖宮產的患者,進行迴顧性分析,比較其手術時間、術後情況。結果觀察組和對照組體溫升高再恢複至正常時間分彆為(18.8±2.6)h、(20.6±3.0)h,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);通氣時間分彆為(16.25±9.25)h、(22.32±10.50)h,顯著縮短(P<0.01);術後外週血白細胞計數分彆為(6.5±1.6)×109/L、(7.1±2.3)×109/L,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);術後鎮痛藥物應用比例分彆為20(20%)、60(60%),差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論改良式腹膜外剖宮產術術後情況優于改良式子宮下段剖宮產術,改良式腹膜外剖宮產術值得推廣。
목적:탐토개량식복막외부궁산술여개량식자궁하단부궁산술적술후정황。방법대2009년1월~2012년12월하남성등봉시중의원행량충술식부궁산적환자,진행회고성분석,비교기수술시간、술후정황。결과관찰조화대조조체온승고재회복지정상시간분별위(18.8±2.6)h、(20.6±3.0)h,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);통기시간분별위(16.25±9.25)h、(22.32±10.50)h,현저축단(P<0.01);술후외주혈백세포계수분별위(6.5±1.6)×109/L、(7.1±2.3)×109/L,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);술후진통약물응용비례분별위20(20%)、60(60%),차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론개량식복막외부궁산술술후정황우우개량식자궁하단부궁산술,개량식복막외부궁산술치득추엄。
Objective To discuss the postoperative situation of modified extraperitoneal cesarean section and modified lower uterine segment cesarean section. Methods The patients done two methods of cesarean section in Dengfeng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Henan Province during January 2009 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed, and the operation time, postoperative situation of the two groups were compared. Results The differences were statistically significant in the body temperature returning to normal time, duration of ventilation, peripheral white blood cell count after operation and proportion of analgesic drugs after operation between the observation group and the control group[(18.8±2.6)h, (20.6±3.0)h(P<0.01);(16.25±9.25)h, (22.32±10.50)h(P<0.05);(6.5±1.6)×10 9/L, (7.1±2.3)×10 9/L(P<0.05);20(20%), 60(60%)(P<0.01)]. Conclusion The postoperative situation of modified extraperitoneal cesarean section is better than that of modified lower uterine segment cesarean section, which is worthy of promotion.