中华普通外科学文献(电子版)
中華普通外科學文獻(電子版)
중화보통외과학문헌(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2014年
1期
28-31
,共4页
岑宏%汤聪%梁文丰%殷放%徐飞
岑宏%湯聰%樑文豐%慇放%徐飛
잠굉%탕총%량문봉%은방%서비
腔镜手术%甲状腺固定解除%甲亢%甲状腺容积
腔鏡手術%甲狀腺固定解除%甲亢%甲狀腺容積
강경수술%갑상선고정해제%갑항%갑상선용적
Endoscopic surgery%Thyroid attachment removal%Graves' disease%Thyroid volume
目的探讨腔镜下手术治疗甲状腺功能亢进(甲亢)的实用性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2011年12月收治的115例甲亢患者资料,术前准备方法相同及采用甲状腺固定解除手术方式的45例患者入组,分为开放手术组(28例)和腔镜手术组(17例),对两组患者年龄、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后并发症、住院天数、住院费用等数据进行统计学分析。结果开放组平均年龄(34.6±10.1)岁,腔镜组(27.1±5.7)岁,两组年龄差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量、住院天数、住院费用、服碘前甲状腺容积、术后低钙血症、喉返或喉上神经损伤等数据差异无统计学意义。开放组手术时间平均(1.68±0.69)h,术后引流量平均(95.0±68.3)ml;腔镜组手术时间平均(2.87±0.67)h,术后引流量平均(179.7±70.8)ml,两组数据差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腔镜组无一例中转为开放手术,随访至今无甲状腺功能低下或甲亢复发者。结论腔镜下采用甲状腺固定解除手术方式治疗甲亢是安全、可行的。
目的探討腔鏡下手術治療甲狀腺功能亢進(甲亢)的實用性和安全性。方法迴顧性分析2008年1月至2011年12月收治的115例甲亢患者資料,術前準備方法相同及採用甲狀腺固定解除手術方式的45例患者入組,分為開放手術組(28例)和腔鏡手術組(17例),對兩組患者年齡、手術時間、術中齣血量、術後引流量、術後併髮癥、住院天數、住院費用等數據進行統計學分析。結果開放組平均年齡(34.6±10.1)歲,腔鏡組(27.1±5.7)歲,兩組年齡差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組術中齣血量、住院天數、住院費用、服碘前甲狀腺容積、術後低鈣血癥、喉返或喉上神經損傷等數據差異無統計學意義。開放組手術時間平均(1.68±0.69)h,術後引流量平均(95.0±68.3)ml;腔鏡組手術時間平均(2.87±0.67)h,術後引流量平均(179.7±70.8)ml,兩組數據差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。腔鏡組無一例中轉為開放手術,隨訪至今無甲狀腺功能低下或甲亢複髮者。結論腔鏡下採用甲狀腺固定解除手術方式治療甲亢是安全、可行的。
목적탐토강경하수술치료갑상선공능항진(갑항)적실용성화안전성。방법회고성분석2008년1월지2011년12월수치적115례갑항환자자료,술전준비방법상동급채용갑상선고정해제수술방식적45례환자입조,분위개방수술조(28례)화강경수술조(17례),대량조환자년령、수술시간、술중출혈량、술후인류량、술후병발증、주원천수、주원비용등수거진행통계학분석。결과개방조평균년령(34.6±10.1)세,강경조(27.1±5.7)세,량조년령차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조술중출혈량、주원천수、주원비용、복전전갑상선용적、술후저개혈증、후반혹후상신경손상등수거차이무통계학의의。개방조수술시간평균(1.68±0.69)h,술후인류량평균(95.0±68.3)ml;강경조수술시간평균(2.87±0.67)h,술후인류량평균(179.7±70.8)ml,량조수거차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。강경조무일례중전위개방수술,수방지금무갑상선공능저하혹갑항복발자。결론강경하채용갑상선고정해제수술방식치료갑항시안전、가행적。
Objective To investigate the practicability and safety of endoscopic thyroidectomy for treatment of Graves' disease. Methods One hundred and fifteen patients with Graves' disease from January 2008 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-five patients undergoing the same preoperative preparations and via attachment removal approach were included in this study and were divided into open surgery group (28 cases) and endoscopic surgery group (17 cases). Statistical analysis had been conducted on data including age, operative time, amount of bleeding during the operation, postoperative suction drainage, hospital stay, postoperation complication, and hospitalization expense between the two groups. Results The mean age for open group and endoscopic group was (34.6±10.1) and (27.1±5.7) respectively;the difference had statistical significance. The differences of the mean amount of bleeding, mean hospital stay, hospitalization expense, thyroid volume before patients taking iodine, hypocalcemia and recurrent laryngeal nerve or superior laryngeal nerve injuries between the groups were not statistically significant. The mean operative time and postoperative suction drainage of open group was (1.68±0.69) h and (95.0±68.3) ml respectively;while that of endoscopic group was (2.87±0.67) h and (179.7±70.8) ml. There were statistical significances between the differences (P<0.05). No conversion was required in endoscopic group. No hypothyroidism or recurrent hyperthyroidism had occurred up to now. Conclusion Endoscopic thyroidectomy for Graves' disease via attachment remove approach is safe and feasible.