实用医学影像杂志
實用醫學影像雜誌
실용의학영상잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICAL IMAGING
2014年
1期
15-17
,共3页
张永涛%亓卿燕%葛向红%李海燕
張永濤%亓卿燕%葛嚮紅%李海燕
장영도%기경연%갈향홍%리해연
嗜酸细胞肉芽肿%眼眶%体层摄影术,螺旋计算机%诊断
嗜痠細胞肉芽腫%眼眶%體層攝影術,螺鏇計算機%診斷
기산세포육아종%안광%체층섭영술,라선계산궤%진단
Eosinophilic granuloma%Orbit%Tomography,spiral computed%Diagnosis
目的:探讨眼眶骨嗜酸性肉芽肿的CT表现及临床特点,以提高对本病的诊断水平。方法回顾性分析2009年9月至2013年2月经手术及病理证实的8例嗜酸性肉芽肿患者的临床特点、影像学特征及术后复查情况。结果 CT表现:3例呈溶骨性破坏,边界不清,呈地图样,边缘骨质硬化,内可见碎骨片,周围可见软组织肿块,肿块范围大于骨质破坏范围;2例呈虫蚀样骨质破坏;3例表现为穿凿样骨质破坏,边界锐利,无明显硬化边,其内被软组织密度影充填,并突破骨质,侵犯硬脑膜及颅骨内、外板向眶内外生长。磁共振成像多表现为等或长T1长T2信号影,T2压脂序列病灶呈低信号,其间可夹杂高信号。术后随访2年,3例病变基本愈合,与正常骨质无明显区别,5例钛网固定良好,8例均未见复发。结论眼眶骨嗜酸性肉芽肿易与其他恶性病变相混淆,正确诊断有赖于临床、影像学、病理相结合,综合细致的全面分析有利于提高对本病的诊断水平。
目的:探討眼眶骨嗜痠性肉芽腫的CT錶現及臨床特點,以提高對本病的診斷水平。方法迴顧性分析2009年9月至2013年2月經手術及病理證實的8例嗜痠性肉芽腫患者的臨床特點、影像學特徵及術後複查情況。結果 CT錶現:3例呈溶骨性破壞,邊界不清,呈地圖樣,邊緣骨質硬化,內可見碎骨片,週圍可見軟組織腫塊,腫塊範圍大于骨質破壞範圍;2例呈蟲蝕樣骨質破壞;3例錶現為穿鑿樣骨質破壞,邊界銳利,無明顯硬化邊,其內被軟組織密度影充填,併突破骨質,侵犯硬腦膜及顱骨內、外闆嚮眶內外生長。磁共振成像多錶現為等或長T1長T2信號影,T2壓脂序列病竈呈低信號,其間可夾雜高信號。術後隨訪2年,3例病變基本愈閤,與正常骨質無明顯區彆,5例鈦網固定良好,8例均未見複髮。結論眼眶骨嗜痠性肉芽腫易與其他噁性病變相混淆,正確診斷有賴于臨床、影像學、病理相結閤,綜閤細緻的全麵分析有利于提高對本病的診斷水平。
목적:탐토안광골기산성육아종적CT표현급림상특점,이제고대본병적진단수평。방법회고성분석2009년9월지2013년2월경수술급병리증실적8례기산성육아종환자적림상특점、영상학특정급술후복사정황。결과 CT표현:3례정용골성파배,변계불청,정지도양,변연골질경화,내가견쇄골편,주위가견연조직종괴,종괴범위대우골질파배범위;2례정충식양골질파배;3례표현위천착양골질파배,변계예리,무명현경화변,기내피연조직밀도영충전,병돌파골질,침범경뇌막급로골내、외판향광내외생장。자공진성상다표현위등혹장T1장T2신호영,T2압지서렬병조정저신호,기간가협잡고신호。술후수방2년,3례병변기본유합,여정상골질무명현구별,5례태망고정량호,8례균미견복발。결론안광골기산성육아종역여기타악성병변상혼효,정학진단유뢰우림상、영상학、병리상결합,종합세치적전면분석유리우제고대본병적진단수평。
Objective To improve the diagnostic level of orbital eosinophilic granuloma by discussing the clin-ical characteristics and imaging features. Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical features, imaging character-istics and circumstances after review in 8 patients with eosinophilic granuloma, which confirmed by the surgery and pathology from September 2009 to Feburary 2013 in Shanxi Eye Hospital. Results In CT manifestations, 3 cases showed osteolytic destruction with unclear edge like a map, hardened edge, bone fragments, soft tissue mass around, and the mass range was larger than the range of bone destruction. Two cases showed vermiform destruction of bone. Three cases showed farfetched like bone destruction, sharp boundaries, no hardened edge, it was filled with soft tissue, and broke the bone, dura and the skull violations, outside the orbit to the outer plate growth. The MR performance had T1 long T2 signal intensity, T2 fat saturation sequence lesion showed low signal, along with high signal. Postoperative follow-up was two years. Three cases had no obvious difference from the normal ones. Five cases with titanium mesh fixed well. Eight cases showed no recurrence. Conclusion Orbital eosinophilic granuloma and other malignant le-sions are easy to be confused. The correct diagnosis relies on combination of clinical, radiological, pathological as-pects. A comprehensive detailed analysis is helpful to improve the diagnostic level of this disease.