天津工业大学学报
天津工業大學學報
천진공업대학학보
JOURNAL OF TIANJIN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
2014年
1期
15-19
,共5页
静电纺%聚酰亚胺%纳米纤维%锂电隔膜%电化学性能
靜電紡%聚酰亞胺%納米纖維%鋰電隔膜%電化學性能
정전방%취선아알%납미섬유%리전격막%전화학성능
electrospinning%polyimide%nano-fibers%membrane for lithium ion battery%electrochemical properties
通过静电纺丝和热亚胺化处理制备热固性聚酰亚胺(PI)纳米纤维膜,并研究隔膜的力学性能及在2种充电截止电压(常用的4.2 V和高电压4.4 V)下的电化学循环性能.结果表明:PI纳米纤维的平均直径为276 nm,作为隔膜的孔隙率高达92%,且其吸液率远远高于商业用Celgard2400隔膜;0.2C/0.2C速率50次充放电循环下,2种电压范围下的容量保持率均在80%以上,且在2.8~4.4 V高电压下的容量保持率高达91.6%,明显优于Celgard2400;在2种电压范围内,随着放电倍率的增大,其比容量衰减较Celgard2400隔膜缓慢,PI膜表现出更优异的倍率性能.
通過靜電紡絲和熱亞胺化處理製備熱固性聚酰亞胺(PI)納米纖維膜,併研究隔膜的力學性能及在2種充電截止電壓(常用的4.2 V和高電壓4.4 V)下的電化學循環性能.結果錶明:PI納米纖維的平均直徑為276 nm,作為隔膜的孔隙率高達92%,且其吸液率遠遠高于商業用Celgard2400隔膜;0.2C/0.2C速率50次充放電循環下,2種電壓範圍下的容量保持率均在80%以上,且在2.8~4.4 V高電壓下的容量保持率高達91.6%,明顯優于Celgard2400;在2種電壓範圍內,隨著放電倍率的增大,其比容量衰減較Celgard2400隔膜緩慢,PI膜錶現齣更優異的倍率性能.
통과정전방사화열아알화처리제비열고성취선아알(PI)납미섬유막,병연구격막적역학성능급재2충충전절지전압(상용적4.2 V화고전압4.4 V)하적전화학순배성능.결과표명:PI납미섬유적평균직경위276 nm,작위격막적공극솔고체92%,차기흡액솔원원고우상업용Celgard2400격막;0.2C/0.2C속솔50차충방전순배하,2충전압범위하적용량보지솔균재80%이상,차재2.8~4.4 V고전압하적용량보지솔고체91.6%,명현우우Celgard2400;재2충전압범위내,수착방전배솔적증대,기비용량쇠감교Celgard2400격막완만,PI막표현출경우이적배솔성능.
The thermosetting polyimide (PI) nano-fibers based nonwoven membrane is prepared by electrospinning technique and followed by thermal imidization. The physical and mechanical properties of PI nano-fibers based nonwoven separators are tested and the electrochemical performance of the PI membrane for lithium ion battery at different charge cut-off voltage (herein, common voltage 4.2 V and higher 4.4 V) is investigated. The results show that the average diameter of PI nano-fibers is as fine as 276 nm; the porosity of PI nano-fibers based nonwoven separators is up to 92% and they exhibit better wettability for the polar electrolyte compared to the commercial Celgard 2400 membrane; After 50 cycles at 0.2C/0.2C charge and discharge rate, the capacity retention ratio of the cell assembled with PI nano-fibers based nonwoven separators at both voltage range is higher than 80%, especially that of 4.4 V charge is up to 91.6%, which are obviously superior to commercial Celgard 2400 membrane; moreover, the special capacity of PI separators fades slower than Celgard 2400 membrane with the increase of discharge rate at both situation.