上海大学学报(社会科学版)
上海大學學報(社會科學版)
상해대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2014年
1期
109-123
,共15页
三网融合%行动者-网络理论%发展模式%转译
三網融閤%行動者-網絡理論%髮展模式%轉譯
삼망융합%행동자-망락이론%발전모식%전역
tri-networks integration%actor-network theory%development model%translation
我国三网融合于2010年进入实质性发展阶段,与之相关的技术问题、利益问题和规制问题等都备受关注,探索三网融合发展模式成为社会各界讨论的焦点。基于行动者-网络研究表明,上海市三网融合发展是混合外生与内生的发展模式---“过程由产业部门控制,决策由政府推动和产业部门选择”的模式。通过网络组构发现,在上海市三网融合过程中发生过“伪取代”,“势均力敌”的资源持有状态有助于融合各方力量加以发展,并亟待制度方面的“顶层设计”。同时,案例研究表明,行动者-网络理论成为三网融合研究范式,仍需要从内部与外部空间分割问题、内生与外生因素界定、网络大小问题、网络数量问题和政府权力问题等方面进一步探究。
我國三網融閤于2010年進入實質性髮展階段,與之相關的技術問題、利益問題和規製問題等都備受關註,探索三網融閤髮展模式成為社會各界討論的焦點。基于行動者-網絡研究錶明,上海市三網融閤髮展是混閤外生與內生的髮展模式---“過程由產業部門控製,決策由政府推動和產業部門選擇”的模式。通過網絡組構髮現,在上海市三網融閤過程中髮生過“偽取代”,“勢均力敵”的資源持有狀態有助于融閤各方力量加以髮展,併亟待製度方麵的“頂層設計”。同時,案例研究錶明,行動者-網絡理論成為三網融閤研究範式,仍需要從內部與外部空間分割問題、內生與外生因素界定、網絡大小問題、網絡數量問題和政府權力問題等方麵進一步探究。
아국삼망융합우2010년진입실질성발전계단,여지상관적기술문제、이익문제화규제문제등도비수관주,탐색삼망융합발전모식성위사회각계토론적초점。기우행동자-망락연구표명,상해시삼망융합발전시혼합외생여내생적발전모식---“과정유산업부문공제,결책유정부추동화산업부문선택”적모식。통과망락조구발현,재상해시삼망융합과정중발생과“위취대”,“세균력활”적자원지유상태유조우융합각방역량가이발전,병극대제도방면적“정층설계”。동시,안례연구표명,행동자-망락이론성위삼망융합연구범식,잉수요종내부여외부공간분할문제、내생여외생인소계정、망락대소문제、망락수량문제화정부권력문제등방면진일보탐구。
2010 witnessed significant development of China ’s tri-networks integration.Since then, related technical issues, interests and regulations have drawn much attention from the public and the development mode of tri-networks integration has also become a central issue for discussion and debate among many circles .Based on actor-network theory, this study of tri-networks integration in Shanghai shows that the city has created a model that combines exogenous and endogenous development , that is,“process controlled by the industrial sec-tor, decision making led by government and selected by industry sectors ”.As is demonstrated in the network configuration, the“pseudo replacement” that occurs in Shanghai ’s tri-networks integration helps to create well balanced resources pools which foster the development of tri -networks integration.The case study also suggests that it's urgent to develop “top-level” designing in system and institutions .Besides, the actor-network theory, if it is to serve as a research paradigm for tri-networks integration, needs to be further developed and refined in order to better address such issues as the segmentation of the internal and external space , the discrimination of endogenous and exogenous factors and the assessment of the size and number of networks as well as the power of the government etc.