CAJ | 학술논문

以终局裁判为逻辑前提的刑事再审制度，其正统性来自两方面：一是原来的程序运行本身出现了重大瑕疵；二是原程序尽管已经按照相关规则进行并完成，但其制度功能由于某种原因未能实现，并且触犯了其他重要价值。据此，刑事再审的制度功能可以从形式理性理论和程序规律角度区分为修复原程序运行瑕疵的“补正”以及帮助原程序功能复位的“矫正”。以“补正”和“矫正”的分类视角重新检视刑事再审的制度定位问题，有助于正确设计和解读刑事再审的具体制度，尤其是再审的启动制度。为了应对刑事再审实践困境，一方面需要从程序规律的分类研究视角将刑事再审启动事由加以整合和清理，另一方面也需要强化作为再审逻辑前提的原程序的制度建设。
이종국재판위라집전제적형사재심제도，기정통성래자량방면：일시원래적정서운행본신출현료중대하자；이시원정서진관이경안조상관규칙진행병완성，단기제도공능유우모충원인미능실현，병차촉범료기타중요개치。거차，형사재심적제도공능가이종형식이성이론화정서규률각도구분위수복원정서운행하자적“보정”이급방조원정서공능복위적“교정”。이“보정”화“교정”적분류시각중신검시형사재심적제도정위문제，유조우정학설계화해독형사재심적구체제도，우기시재심적계동제도。위료응대형사재심실천곤경，일방면수요종정서규률적분류연구시각장형사재심계동사유가이정합화청리，령일방면야수요강화작위재심라집전제적원정서적제도건설。
The criminal retrial system, whose logical premise is a final decision , becomes legitimized when certain serious defects occur in the original procedure , or when its expected functions fail somehow and meanwhile infringe on other significant values , even though the original procedure develops and is completed in accordance with rules.Therefore, from the perspective of the formal rational theory and the rules of procedure , the functions of criminal retrial system can be categorized into two groups :rectification as to fix the defects in the original procedure, and redress as to help restore the balance of values .Re-examining criminal retrial func-tion orientation in terms of rectification and redress , we might better design and implement the specific institu-tions of criminal retrial, especially the re-opening institution.To resolve the problems in the criminal retrial practice, it is necessary to classify and sort out the re-opening reasons and to improve the original procedure , which serves as the premise of retrial .