CAJ | 학술논문

关于“前近代经济-社会史”的研究，西方学界首开其端，形成若干种流派。进入中国以后，与本土问题相结合，表现更加多样。本文根据语义分析学中“同一‘能指’背后的‘所指转换’无限可能，以及在‘能指冲突’中理解‘所指’”的方法，一方面将各流派对前近代经济社会结构的理解作为一个维度，形成“共同体本位”与“个体本位”之事实差异；另一方面，将各流派对自由的态度作为一个维度，形成“对自由的认同”与“对反自由的认同”之价值差异。两维交叉，构成一个历史与逻辑的述评框架，从中或许可以窥见各派之间的共同点与分歧所在。
관우“전근대경제-사회사”적연구，서방학계수개기단，형성약간충류파。진입중국이후，여본토문제상결합，표현경가다양。본문근거어의분석학중“동일‘능지’배후적‘소지전환’무한가능，이급재‘능지충돌’중리해‘소지’”적방법，일방면장각류파대전근대경제사회결구적리해작위일개유도，형성“공동체본위”여“개체본위”지사실차이；령일방면，장각류파대자유적태도작위일개유도，형성“대자유적인동”여“대반자유적인동”지개치차이。량유교차，구성일개역사여라집적술평광가，종중혹허가이규견각파지간적공동점여분기소재。
About the study of “pre-modern ’ s economic -social history”, the western academia have opened the first port , and it has formed some kinds of schools .It present more diversity when combined with domestic problems after entering China .This article is based on the semantic analytics of method that the same signlfier could translate into different signified and understand the signified in the signlfier conflict.On the one hand, as a dimension that various schools ’ understanding of modern economic and social structure , forming the fact that differences of “the community standard” and“the individual stand-ard”;on the other hand , it makes the various schools ’ attitude towards freedom as another dimension , forming the value differences between the “identification of freedom”and the“identification of the anti -freedom”.The two dimensional cross and constitute a review of the history and logic framework , which may be able to catch a glimpse of the similarities and differences among various schools .