江西医药
江西醫藥
강서의약
JIANGXI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
1期
15-16
,共2页
郭朝阳%秦章禄%徐辉%何德
郭朝暘%秦章祿%徐輝%何德
곽조양%진장록%서휘%하덕
完整结肠系膜切除%中央血管结扎%结肠癌
完整結腸繫膜切除%中央血管結扎%結腸癌
완정결장계막절제%중앙혈관결찰%결장암
Complete mesocolon resection%Central vascular ligation%Colon cancer
目的:探讨完整结肠系膜切除(complete mesocolic excision,CME)联合中央血管结扎(central vascular ligation, CVL)技术在右侧结肠癌手术治疗中的应用效果。方法回顾分析32例右侧结肠癌CME联合CVL技术的临床资料,并与常规手术组比较。结果两组均无切口感染及吻合口瘘并发症,对照组有1例患者出现粘连性肠梗阻;CME组32例结肠系膜均完整,无破损,对照组30例中有18例结肠系膜破损,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.408;P<0.001);CME联合CVL组淋巴结清扫平均数(14.2±2.6)枚,对照组为(8.3±1.9)枚,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=36.54;P<0.001),其中CME联合CVL组淋巴结阳性率为42.3%,对照组为37.8%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 CME能保证结肠系膜的完整切除、同时能收获更多的淋巴结,有利于结肠癌的根治性完整切除。
目的:探討完整結腸繫膜切除(complete mesocolic excision,CME)聯閤中央血管結扎(central vascular ligation, CVL)技術在右側結腸癌手術治療中的應用效果。方法迴顧分析32例右側結腸癌CME聯閤CVL技術的臨床資料,併與常規手術組比較。結果兩組均無切口感染及吻閤口瘺併髮癥,對照組有1例患者齣現粘連性腸梗阻;CME組32例結腸繫膜均完整,無破損,對照組30例中有18例結腸繫膜破損,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(χ2=13.408;P<0.001);CME聯閤CVL組淋巴結清掃平均數(14.2±2.6)枚,對照組為(8.3±1.9)枚,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(t=36.54;P<0.001),其中CME聯閤CVL組淋巴結暘性率為42.3%,對照組為37.8%,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 CME能保證結腸繫膜的完整切除、同時能收穫更多的淋巴結,有利于結腸癌的根治性完整切除。
목적:탐토완정결장계막절제(complete mesocolic excision,CME)연합중앙혈관결찰(central vascular ligation, CVL)기술재우측결장암수술치료중적응용효과。방법회고분석32례우측결장암CME연합CVL기술적림상자료,병여상규수술조비교。결과량조균무절구감염급문합구루병발증,대조조유1례환자출현점련성장경조;CME조32례결장계막균완정,무파손,대조조30례중유18례결장계막파손,량조비교차이유통계학의의(χ2=13.408;P<0.001);CME연합CVL조림파결청소평균수(14.2±2.6)매,대조조위(8.3±1.9)매,량조비교차이유통계학의의(t=36.54;P<0.001),기중CME연합CVL조림파결양성솔위42.3%,대조조위37.8%,량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 CME능보증결장계막적완정절제、동시능수획경다적림파결,유리우결장암적근치성완정절제。
Objective To investigate the effect of complete mesocolic excision(CME) united central vascular ligation(CVL) in right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer. Methods Retrospective analysis the clinical data of 32 patients with right hemicolectomy for colonic carcinoma undergoing CME combined with CVL,and compared with control group of 30 patients with underwent tradi-tional radical resection. Results The two groups had no incision infection and anastomotic leakage. 1 patient had intestinal ob-struction of adhesion in control group,32 cases of mesocolon were complete resected in CME combined with CVL group,18 cases of mesocolon were not complete resected in the control group,the difference has statistical significant (χ2=13.408,P<0.001);The average number of lymph nodes harvested for CME combined with CVL group was 14.2±2.6,and the control group was 8.3±1.9, the difference has statistical significance too (t=36.54,P<0.001). Lymph node positive rate in CME combined with CVL group was 42.3%,while the control group was 37.8%, but there was no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion CME technique for colon cancer can achieveen bloc resection of mesocolon,and have optimal lymph nodes harvest,which is conducive to complete resection of colon cancer.