CAJ | 학술논문

以“李某某”强奸案为代表的实名新闻报道引发学界对新闻媒体在司法报道中是否应该对被诉者的姓名予以公开、对何种被诉者的姓名公开、在什么阶段公开等问题的思考。该问题不但涉及到公众的知情权与被诉者个人的隐私权平衡，还掺杂了对舆论审判的担忧。侵犯公民的姓名权与隐私权行为具有明确之区分，但姓名所隐含的隐私属性也不能完全否定。公众和媒体的不良心态以及新闻披露被诉者姓名的危害，使得被诉者姓名隐私属性的保护成为必要，对其分阶段、分情况加以确认与保护成为当前司法学界和实务界必须要解决的问题。
이“리모모”강간안위대표적실명신문보도인발학계대신문매체재사법보도중시부응해대피소자적성명여이공개、대하충피소자적성명공개、재십요계단공개등문제적사고。해문제불단섭급도공음적지정권여피소자개인적은사권평형，환참잡료대여론심판적담우。침범공민적성명권여은사권행위구유명학지구분，단성명소은함적은사속성야불능완전부정。공음화매체적불양심태이급신문피로피소자성명적위해，사득피소자성명은사속성적보호성위필요，대기분계단、분정황가이학인여보호성위당전사법학계화실무계필수요해결적문제。
As a typical representative of the real name reporting ,the Li’s Rape Case sparked the following considerations in the academia and journalism .These problems include whether to open re-spondent’s name in the judicial report ,w hat kind of respondent’s name should be opened ,and w hen to open respondent’s name .This not only relates to the balance between the public’s right to know and the privacy right of respondent’s name ,but also refers to the concerns about public opinion trial that may affect fair trial .Though the name right infringement obviously differs from violation of privacy , we cannot deny privacy attributes of the defendant’s name .The negative attitude of the public and media and the damage that news reveals the respondent’s name ,make it necessary to protect privacy at-tributes of the defendant’s name in the news report .Issues on confirmation over different stages and situations to protect the respondent’s name must be resolved in the academia and journalism .