南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
1期
84-87
,共4页
徐贤%安宁豫%陈穗惠%李雪%江波%韩邵君%刘新球
徐賢%安寧豫%陳穗惠%李雪%江波%韓邵君%劉新毬
서현%안저예%진수혜%리설%강파%한소군%류신구
肾动脉狭窄%磁共振血管成像%老年人%流入反转恢复
腎動脈狹窄%磁共振血管成像%老年人%流入反轉恢複
신동맥협착%자공진혈관성상%노년인%류입반전회복
renal artery stenosis%magnetic resonance angiography%elderly patients%inflow inversion recovery
目的:评估流入反转恢复稳态自由进动(IFIR-FIEASTA)序列诊断老年患者肾动脉狭窄的效能。方法对27例老年患者进行三维对比增强磁共振血管成像(3D CE-MRA)和IFIR-FIEASTA扫描,比较两种检查方法的图像质量,采用Kappa分析检验IFIR-FIEASTA和CE-MRA诊断肾动脉狭窄的一致性。以CE-MRA为金标准,评估IFIR-FIEASTA诊断肾动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果两种检查方法的图像质量均100%达到诊断要求,但CE-MRA的图像质量显著优于IFIR-FIEASTA。CE-MRA和IFIR-FIEASTA诊断肾动脉狭窄的一致性好;IFIR-FIEASTA诊断肾动脉狭窄的敏感度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为97.1%、100%、98.1%、100%和95%。结论IFIR-FIEASTA诊断老年患者肾动脉狭窄的可行性很高,临床实用性强。
目的:評估流入反轉恢複穩態自由進動(IFIR-FIEASTA)序列診斷老年患者腎動脈狹窄的效能。方法對27例老年患者進行三維對比增彊磁共振血管成像(3D CE-MRA)和IFIR-FIEASTA掃描,比較兩種檢查方法的圖像質量,採用Kappa分析檢驗IFIR-FIEASTA和CE-MRA診斷腎動脈狹窄的一緻性。以CE-MRA為金標準,評估IFIR-FIEASTA診斷腎動脈狹窄的敏感度、特異度、準確率、暘性預測值和陰性預測值。結果兩種檢查方法的圖像質量均100%達到診斷要求,但CE-MRA的圖像質量顯著優于IFIR-FIEASTA。CE-MRA和IFIR-FIEASTA診斷腎動脈狹窄的一緻性好;IFIR-FIEASTA診斷腎動脈狹窄的敏感度、特異度、準確率、暘性預測值和陰性預測值分彆為97.1%、100%、98.1%、100%和95%。結論IFIR-FIEASTA診斷老年患者腎動脈狹窄的可行性很高,臨床實用性彊。
목적:평고류입반전회복은태자유진동(IFIR-FIEASTA)서렬진단노년환자신동맥협착적효능。방법대27례노년환자진행삼유대비증강자공진혈관성상(3D CE-MRA)화IFIR-FIEASTA소묘,비교량충검사방법적도상질량,채용Kappa분석검험IFIR-FIEASTA화CE-MRA진단신동맥협착적일치성。이CE-MRA위금표준,평고IFIR-FIEASTA진단신동맥협착적민감도、특이도、준학솔、양성예측치화음성예측치。결과량충검사방법적도상질량균100%체도진단요구,단CE-MRA적도상질량현저우우IFIR-FIEASTA。CE-MRA화IFIR-FIEASTA진단신동맥협착적일치성호;IFIR-FIEASTA진단신동맥협착적민감도、특이도、준학솔、양성예측치화음성예측치분별위97.1%、100%、98.1%、100%화95%。결론IFIR-FIEASTA진단노년환자신동맥협착적가행성흔고,림상실용성강。
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of IFIR-FIESTA technique in detecting renal artery stenosis in elderly patients. Methods Twenty-seven aged patients underwent both IFIR-FIESTA and 3D CE-MRA examinations. The imaging quality and renal artery stenosis grades were evaluated. Kappa test was used to assess the consistency between the two methods. With CE-MRA as the reference, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for IFIR-FIESTA were calculated in detecting renal artery stenosis. Results The images by the two methods were 100% qualified for diagnosis, although the image quality of CE-MRA was significantly better. IFIR-FIESTA and CE-MRA showed excellent consistency in detecting renal artery stenosis. With CE-MRA as the reference, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV for IFIR-FIESTA were 97.1%, 100%, 98.1%, 100%, and 95%in detecting renal artery stenosis, respectively. Conclusion IFIR-FIESTA is feasible as a routine examination for detecting renal artery stenosis in elderly patients.