中国临床新医学
中國臨床新醫學
중국림상신의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
2014年
2期
144-146
,共3页
七氟烷%麻醉诱导%不良反应
七氟烷%痳醉誘導%不良反應
칠불완%마취유도%불량반응
Sevoflurane%Anesthetic induction%Adverse effects
目的探讨高初始浓度七氟烷吸入诱导全身麻醉的安全性和有效性。方法选取择期手术全麻的成年患者300例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,按手术日期单双号半随机分为两组,均予七氟烷麻醉诱导。低初始浓度组179例,最初给予低的初始浓度(0.5%),然后逐渐增加剂量,直到病人被麻醉。高初始浓度组121例,开始即给予高浓度(4%~8%),直到病人被麻醉。两种方法均可使用不同呼吸模式,记录睫毛反射消失时间和不良反应发生例数。结果高初始浓度组睫毛反射消失时间明显短于低初始浓度组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组的各种不良反应的发生率差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论高初始七氟烷浓度与低初始浓度相比诱导时间更短,并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义,值得推广应用。
目的探討高初始濃度七氟烷吸入誘導全身痳醉的安全性和有效性。方法選取擇期手術全痳的成年患者300例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ級,按手術日期單雙號半隨機分為兩組,均予七氟烷痳醉誘導。低初始濃度組179例,最初給予低的初始濃度(0.5%),然後逐漸增加劑量,直到病人被痳醉。高初始濃度組121例,開始即給予高濃度(4%~8%),直到病人被痳醉。兩種方法均可使用不同呼吸模式,記錄睫毛反射消失時間和不良反應髮生例數。結果高初始濃度組睫毛反射消失時間明顯短于低初始濃度組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。兩組的各種不良反應的髮生率差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論高初始七氟烷濃度與低初始濃度相比誘導時間更短,併髮癥髮生率差異均無統計學意義,值得推廣應用。
목적탐토고초시농도칠불완흡입유도전신마취적안전성화유효성。방법선취택기수술전마적성년환자300례,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ급,안수술일기단쌍호반수궤분위량조,균여칠불완마취유도。저초시농도조179례,최초급여저적초시농도(0.5%),연후축점증가제량,직도병인피마취。고초시농도조121례,개시즉급여고농도(4%~8%),직도병인피마취。량충방법균가사용불동호흡모식,기록첩모반사소실시간화불량반응발생례수。결과고초시농도조첩모반사소실시간명현단우저초시농도조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。량조적각충불량반응적발생솔차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론고초시칠불완농도여저초시농도상비유도시간경단,병발증발생솔차이균무통계학의의,치득추엄응용。
Objective To investgatd the safety and efficacy of the high initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of general anaesthesia .Methods Three hundred adult patients undergoing elective surgery an-esthesia , ASAⅠ~Ⅱ, were randomly divided into two groups according to odd or even number of operative date .The low initial concentration group (179 cases) was initially administered a low concentration of sevoflurane then the con-centration was gradually increased until the patient was anaesthetized .The high initial concentration group ( 121 ca-ses) was administered high concentrations of sevoflurane ( from 4%to 8%) from the beginning , continuing until the patients was anaesthetized .Both techniques can be carried out using different breathing patterns .Time to loss of eye-lash reflex(LOER)(seconds), complication rates in the two groups were recorded .Results Time to LOER in high initial concentration group was obviously shorter than the lower initial concentration groups , the differences were statis-tically significant (P<0.01).There was no difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the two groups (P>0.05 ) .Conclusion Compared with low initial concentration of sevoflurane a high initial concentration sevoflurane probably offers more rapid induction of anaesthesia and a similar rate of complications , especially worth promoting .