天津医药
天津醫藥
천진의약
TIANJIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
2期
181-183
,共3页
韩生寿%刘海龙%徐卫松%刘斌
韓生壽%劉海龍%徐衛鬆%劉斌
한생수%류해룡%서위송%류빈
腰椎%脊柱侧凸%减压术,外科%椎间融合
腰椎%脊柱側凸%減壓術,外科%椎間融閤
요추%척주측철%감압술,외과%추간융합
lumbar vertebrae%scoliosis,degenerative%decompression,surgical%lumbar interbody fusion
目的:评估后路减压联合椎间融合治疗腰椎退变性侧凸的临床疗效,探讨腰椎退变性侧凸的手术策略。方法回顾性分析手术治疗腰椎退变性侧凸患者98例,男35例,女63例;平均年龄(56±9)岁;平均侧凸Cobb角为(26±9)°;平均腰椎前凸为(19±11)°。采用后正中入路,行责任节段减压联合椎间融合内固定治疗。采用JOA29分标准进行临床疗效评定以及Cobb角和腰椎前凸角变化来评价手术疗效。结果平均随访时间(3.7±2.4)年。术前JOA评分为(10±2)分,提高到末次随访时的(26±3)分;优良率为89.7%。无患者术后症状加重,所有患者均感觉较术前症状明显减轻。平均椎间达骨性融合时间为(5.7±1.4)个月。末次随访时X线片示平均腰椎侧凸Cobb角为(6±2)°,平均矫正度数为(17±4)°,矫正率为59.2%;平均腰椎前凸矫正度数为(12±3)°。无内固定断裂和松动;钛合金cage轻度后侧移位2例,无不适症状,未做处理。结论对于有临床症状的退变性腰椎侧凸,且保守治疗无效的患者,采用后路减压联合椎间融合治疗可以取得满意的临床疗效。但责任节段的确定、减压充分和恢复腰椎稳定性是长期疗效的保证。
目的:評估後路減壓聯閤椎間融閤治療腰椎退變性側凸的臨床療效,探討腰椎退變性側凸的手術策略。方法迴顧性分析手術治療腰椎退變性側凸患者98例,男35例,女63例;平均年齡(56±9)歲;平均側凸Cobb角為(26±9)°;平均腰椎前凸為(19±11)°。採用後正中入路,行責任節段減壓聯閤椎間融閤內固定治療。採用JOA29分標準進行臨床療效評定以及Cobb角和腰椎前凸角變化來評價手術療效。結果平均隨訪時間(3.7±2.4)年。術前JOA評分為(10±2)分,提高到末次隨訪時的(26±3)分;優良率為89.7%。無患者術後癥狀加重,所有患者均感覺較術前癥狀明顯減輕。平均椎間達骨性融閤時間為(5.7±1.4)箇月。末次隨訪時X線片示平均腰椎側凸Cobb角為(6±2)°,平均矯正度數為(17±4)°,矯正率為59.2%;平均腰椎前凸矯正度數為(12±3)°。無內固定斷裂和鬆動;鈦閤金cage輕度後側移位2例,無不適癥狀,未做處理。結論對于有臨床癥狀的退變性腰椎側凸,且保守治療無效的患者,採用後路減壓聯閤椎間融閤治療可以取得滿意的臨床療效。但責任節段的確定、減壓充分和恢複腰椎穩定性是長期療效的保證。
목적:평고후로감압연합추간융합치료요추퇴변성측철적림상료효,탐토요추퇴변성측철적수술책략。방법회고성분석수술치료요추퇴변성측철환자98례,남35례,녀63례;평균년령(56±9)세;평균측철Cobb각위(26±9)°;평균요추전철위(19±11)°。채용후정중입로,행책임절단감압연합추간융합내고정치료。채용JOA29분표준진행림상료효평정이급Cobb각화요추전철각변화래평개수술료효。결과평균수방시간(3.7±2.4)년。술전JOA평분위(10±2)분,제고도말차수방시적(26±3)분;우량솔위89.7%。무환자술후증상가중,소유환자균감각교술전증상명현감경。평균추간체골성융합시간위(5.7±1.4)개월。말차수방시X선편시평균요추측철Cobb각위(6±2)°,평균교정도수위(17±4)°,교정솔위59.2%;평균요추전철교정도수위(12±3)°。무내고정단렬화송동;태합금cage경도후측이위2례,무불괄증상,미주처리。결론대우유림상증상적퇴변성요추측철,차보수치료무효적환자,채용후로감압연합추간융합치료가이취득만의적림상료효。단책임절단적학정、감압충분화회복요추은정성시장기료효적보증。
Objective To assess the clinical outcomes of posterior decompression and lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). Methods Ninety-eight patients underwent surgery for DLS were retrospectively reviewed in this study. The mean age of the patients(male 35 and femail 63) was (56±9) years. The mean Cobb angle of curves was (26±9)° and the mean scoliosis Cobb angle of lumbar was (19±11)° in patients before surgery. A posterior medial incision was made for spinal exposure. According to the preoperative plan, patients were operated with posterior de-compression and lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the JOA scores.The preoperative and postoperative Cobb angle was recorded. Results The mean follow-up time was (3.7±2.4) years. The mean JOA scores were improved from (10±2) points preoperatively to (26±3) points at the last follow-up. The excellent or good outcome rates were 89.7%for patients with surgery. The average interbody fusion time was (5.7±1.4) months. The mean postoperative Cobb angle was (6±2)° at the last follow-up, and the mean Cobb angle correction was (17±4)°, with the correction rate of 59.2%. The mean lumbar lordosis angle was (12±3)°. There was no failure in internal fixation. Conclusion The posterior decompression and lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation appears to be a reasonable option for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.