价值工程
價值工程
개치공정
VALUE ENGINEERING
2014年
3期
264-264,265
,共2页
臧兆萍%刘忠锦%高巍巍%刘晓志%杨晓帆
臧兆萍%劉忠錦%高巍巍%劉曉誌%楊曉帆
장조평%류충금%고외외%류효지%양효범
TBL%神经病学%教学
TBL%神經病學%教學
TBL%신경병학%교학
TBL%neurology%teaching
目的:探讨TBL教学模式在神经病学教学中的应用的效果评估。方法:将2010级医本1班60名本科生作为研究对象,随机分为常规组和TBL组。常规组采用传统的大课进行教学,TBL组利用TBL模式教学,统计分析教学前后成绩。问卷调查学生对TBL教学的看法与满意度等。结果:常规组测试成绩平均分为7.47分,TBL组成绩平均分为9.36分(10分满分),分值提高了18.9%,成绩差别有统计学意义( P约0.05)。问卷调查结果表明85%的同学对本次授课满意。结论:TBL教学模式提高了神经病学的教学质量,增强了团队的合作能力,希望在神经病学的教学中得到广泛应用。
目的:探討TBL教學模式在神經病學教學中的應用的效果評估。方法:將2010級醫本1班60名本科生作為研究對象,隨機分為常規組和TBL組。常規組採用傳統的大課進行教學,TBL組利用TBL模式教學,統計分析教學前後成績。問捲調查學生對TBL教學的看法與滿意度等。結果:常規組測試成績平均分為7.47分,TBL組成績平均分為9.36分(10分滿分),分值提高瞭18.9%,成績差彆有統計學意義( P約0.05)。問捲調查結果錶明85%的同學對本次授課滿意。結論:TBL教學模式提高瞭神經病學的教學質量,增彊瞭糰隊的閤作能力,希望在神經病學的教學中得到廣汎應用。
목적:탐토TBL교학모식재신경병학교학중적응용적효과평고。방법:장2010급의본1반60명본과생작위연구대상,수궤분위상규조화TBL조。상규조채용전통적대과진행교학,TBL조이용TBL모식교학,통계분석교학전후성적。문권조사학생대TBL교학적간법여만의도등。결과:상규조측시성적평균분위7.47분,TBL조성적평균분위9.36분(10분만분),분치제고료18.9%,성적차별유통계학의의( P약0.05)。문권조사결과표명85%적동학대본차수과만의。결론:TBL교학모식제고료신경병학적교학질량,증강료단대적합작능력,희망재신경병학적교학중득도엄범응용。
Objective: discussion on the effect assessment of the application of TBL teaching mode in neurology teaching. Methods:taking 60 undergraduates in class 1, grade 2010 as the research object, randomly divided into normal group and TBL group. Regular group uses traditional large class, TBL group uses TBL model teaching, analyzing the results before and after teaching. We uses the questionnaire to survey students' perceptions and satisfaction of TBL teaching, etc. Results: the average score of regular group is 7.47 score and the average score of TBL group is 9.36 score (the full mark is 10 score), the score is increased by 18.9%, the result difference has statistically significance (P<0.05). Survey results show that 85% students satisfied with the teaching. Conclusion: TBL teaching model improves the teaching quality of neurology, strengthens the team cooperation ability, we hope that it will be widely used in the teaching of neurology.