国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
2013年
11期
2202-2204
,共3页
飞秒激光%角膜板层刀%LASIK手术
飛秒激光%角膜闆層刀%LASIK手術
비초격광%각막판층도%LASIK수술
femtosecond laser%microkeratome%LASIK surgery
目的:对比分析飞秒激光和角膜板层刀行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK)术后患者的视觉质量及角膜瓣变化。方法:选取2009-03/2012-03将接受飞秒激光35例70眼患者和接受角膜板层刀的患者45例90眼进行对比研究,两组术后视觉质量和角膜瓣进行对比。结果:视觉质量比较:两组患者所行的手术均有显著的可预测性、有效性及安全性,且术后像差和对比敏感度及视力差异不显著,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);角膜瓣比较:两组患者在水平方向的角膜瓣厚度组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:飞秒激光和角膜板层刀行LASIK术后具有良好的视觉效果,且角膜瓣厚度差异不显著,值得临床推广使用。
目的:對比分析飛秒激光和角膜闆層刀行準分子激光原位角膜磨鑲術(laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK)術後患者的視覺質量及角膜瓣變化。方法:選取2009-03/2012-03將接受飛秒激光35例70眼患者和接受角膜闆層刀的患者45例90眼進行對比研究,兩組術後視覺質量和角膜瓣進行對比。結果:視覺質量比較:兩組患者所行的手術均有顯著的可預測性、有效性及安全性,且術後像差和對比敏感度及視力差異不顯著,組間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);角膜瓣比較:兩組患者在水平方嚮的角膜瓣厚度組間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:飛秒激光和角膜闆層刀行LASIK術後具有良好的視覺效果,且角膜瓣厚度差異不顯著,值得臨床推廣使用。
목적:대비분석비초격광화각막판층도행준분자격광원위각막마양술(laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK)술후환자적시각질량급각막판변화。방법:선취2009-03/2012-03장접수비초격광35례70안환자화접수각막판층도적환자45례90안진행대비연구,량조술후시각질량화각막판진행대비。결과:시각질량비교:량조환자소행적수술균유현저적가예측성、유효성급안전성,차술후상차화대비민감도급시력차이불현저,조간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);각막판비교:량조환자재수평방향적각막판후도조간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:비초격광화각막판층도행LASIK술후구유량호적시각효과,차각막판후도차이불현저,치득림상추엄사용。
AIM: To compare changes in visual quality and the corneal flap after LASIK surgery with femtosecond laser and microkeratome. METHODS:The study enrolled 80 patients who received LASIK surgery from March 2009 to March 2012 in our hospital.Among them, femtosecond laser was used for 35 patients and microkeratome was used in the other 40 patients, The two groups were compared with each other in postoperative visual quality and the corneal flap. RESULTS: Visual quality: the two surgical procedures both had significant predictability, efficacy and safety, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative visual aberrations and contrast sensitivity ( P >0.05 ); Corneal flap: There was no significant difference between the two groups in corneal thickness at the same horizontal points (P>0.05). CONCLUSION:LASIK surgeries with femtosecond laser and microkeratome, both produce good outcome of vision and the difference in the postoperative corneal flap thickness between the two techniques is not significantly different.