CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析比较使用单纯硬膜外麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉对于妇产科剖宫产术后镇痛的实际效果。方法以我院2012年02月01日到2012年08月01日收治的122例进行剖宫产的产妇为研究对象，平均随机分为2组，每组61例患者，分别称为对照组和实验组，对照组采用单纯硬膜外麻醉，实验组进行腰硬联合麻醉，比较2组的麻醉效果，进行统计学分析。结果腰硬联合麻醉的总有效率为（96.72%），单纯硬膜外麻醉的总有效率为（75.41%），实验组有效率高于对照组，差异显著，具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论剖宫产产妇使用腰硬联合麻醉效果好，值得临床推广！
목적：분석비교사용단순경막외마취여요경연합마취대우부산과부궁산술후진통적실제효과。방법이아원2012년02월01일도2012년08월01일수치적122례진행부궁산적산부위연구대상，평균수궤분위2조，매조61례환자，분별칭위대조조화실험조，대조조채용단순경막외마취，실험조진행요경연합마취，비교2조적마취효과，진행통계학분석。결과요경연합마취적총유효솔위（96.72%），단순경막외마취적총유효솔위（75.41%），실험조유효솔고우대조조，차이현저，구유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론부궁산산부사용요경연합마취효과호，치득림상추엄！
Objective To analyze the comparative use of epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section analgesia after gynecological practical effect. Methods In my hospital Feb. 1, 2012 to August 1, 2012 122 patients were admitted to cesarean section as the research object, the average randomly divided into two groups, each group 61 patients were referred to the control group and the experimental group and the control group were treated with epidural anesthesia, the experimental group epidural anesthesia, anesthetic effect comparing two groups, were statistically analyzed. Results Lumbar epidural anesthesia, the total effective rate (96.72%), epidural anesthesia, the total effective rate (75.41%), the experimental group was higher, the difference is remarkable, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion cesarean section using epidural anesthesia, adverse reactions, worthy of promotion!