国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
14期
2078-2080
,共3页
包金莲%余咏宜%陈晓红%陈艳梅%郑吟燕
包金蓮%餘詠宜%陳曉紅%陳豔梅%鄭吟燕
포금련%여영의%진효홍%진염매%정음연
孕期%健康教育%妊娠结局
孕期%健康教育%妊娠結跼
잉기%건강교육%임신결국
Pregnancy%Health education%Pregnant outcome
目的 观察孕期健康教育妊娠结局的影响,为临床孕期健康教育的实施提供一定的理论依据.方法 选择在罗湖妇幼保健院进行产前检查的孕妇300例,根据随机数字表法将其分为干预组100例和对照组200例.对照组采用常规孕期健康宣传,干预组采用系统保健教育培训进行干预.两组孕妇均在孕14～ 16周开始接受干预直到足月分娩.对比两组孕妇的分娩方式、产程时间、产后出血量、新生儿Apgar评分的情况.结果 干预组孕妇的顺产率为79.00％,显著高于对照组,而剖宫产率为15.00％,显著低于对照组(P＜0.05);干预组的第二产程为(0.59±0.24)h,总产程为(8.32±1.01)h,均显著短于对照组(P＜0.05);干预组孕妇产后出血的发生率为12.00％,显著低于对照组(P＜0.05);干预组新生儿Apgar评分为(9.13±0.96)分,显著高于对照组(P＜0.05).结论 孕期健康教育有助于降低剖宫产率,提高分娩的安全性,减少孕妇和胎儿的并发症,值得在临床上推广应用.
目的 觀察孕期健康教育妊娠結跼的影響,為臨床孕期健康教育的實施提供一定的理論依據.方法 選擇在囉湖婦幼保健院進行產前檢查的孕婦300例,根據隨機數字錶法將其分為榦預組100例和對照組200例.對照組採用常規孕期健康宣傳,榦預組採用繫統保健教育培訓進行榦預.兩組孕婦均在孕14～ 16週開始接受榦預直到足月分娩.對比兩組孕婦的分娩方式、產程時間、產後齣血量、新生兒Apgar評分的情況.結果 榦預組孕婦的順產率為79.00％,顯著高于對照組,而剖宮產率為15.00％,顯著低于對照組(P＜0.05);榦預組的第二產程為(0.59±0.24)h,總產程為(8.32±1.01)h,均顯著短于對照組(P＜0.05);榦預組孕婦產後齣血的髮生率為12.00％,顯著低于對照組(P＜0.05);榦預組新生兒Apgar評分為(9.13±0.96)分,顯著高于對照組(P＜0.05).結論 孕期健康教育有助于降低剖宮產率,提高分娩的安全性,減少孕婦和胎兒的併髮癥,值得在臨床上推廣應用.
목적 관찰잉기건강교육임신결국적영향,위림상잉기건강교육적실시제공일정적이론의거.방법 선택재라호부유보건원진행산전검사적잉부300례,근거수궤수자표법장기분위간예조100례화대조조200례.대조조채용상규잉기건강선전,간예조채용계통보건교육배훈진행간예.량조잉부균재잉14～ 16주개시접수간예직도족월분면.대비량조잉부적분면방식、산정시간、산후출혈량、신생인Apgar평분적정황.결과 간예조잉부적순산솔위79.00％,현저고우대조조,이부궁산솔위15.00％,현저저우대조조(P＜0.05);간예조적제이산정위(0.59±0.24)h,총산정위(8.32±1.01)h,균현저단우대조조(P＜0.05);간예조잉부산후출혈적발생솔위12.00％,현저저우대조조(P＜0.05);간예조신생인Apgar평분위(9.13±0.96)분,현저고우대조조(P＜0.05).결론 잉기건강교육유조우강저부궁산솔,제고분면적안전성,감소잉부화태인적병발증,치득재림상상추엄응용.
Objective To provide theoretical references for the implementation of clinical health education during pregnancy observing the influence of health education during pregnancy pregnant outcome.Methods 300 pregnant women were selected and then randomly divided into an intervention group (100 cases) and a control group (200 cases).The control group were intervened with routine pregnancy health propaganda,and the intervention group with systematical health education training.All pregnant women were intervened from the 14th to 16th week of pregnancy until term delivery.The modes of delivery,labor times,postpartum bleeding volumes,and neonatal Apgar scores were compared between the 2 groups.Results The eutocia rate of the intervention group was 79％,which was significantly higher than that of the control group(P ＜ 0.05); the cesarean section rate of the intervention group was 15％,which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P ＜ 0.05); the second stage of labor was (0.59 ± 0.24) h and the total production course was (8.32 ± 1.01) h in the intervention group,which were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P ＜ 0.05); the postpartum hemorrhage rate of the intervention group was 12％,which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P ＜ 0.05); the neonatal Apgar score of the intervention group was (9.13 ± 0.9),which was significantly higher than that of the control group (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Health education during pregnancy helps reduce the rate of cesarean section,improve the security of delivery,and reduce maternal and fetal complications and is worth being clinically generalized.
