中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2014年
11期
348-348
,共1页
缺血性中风%中西医结合疗法%康复护理
缺血性中風%中西醫結閤療法%康複護理
결혈성중풍%중서의결합요법%강복호리
Ischemic stroke%TCM WM therapy%Rehabilitation nursing
目的：观察中西医结合康复护理对缺血性中风治疗的临床效果。方法120例病例随机分为对照和治疗组。前者采用西医疗法，后者采用中西医结合康复护理，疗程均为14 d。结果治疗后两组总有效率分别为91.67%、76.67%，具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论中西医结合康复护理疗法优于西医治疗。
目的：觀察中西醫結閤康複護理對缺血性中風治療的臨床效果。方法120例病例隨機分為對照和治療組。前者採用西醫療法，後者採用中西醫結閤康複護理，療程均為14 d。結果治療後兩組總有效率分彆為91.67%、76.67%，具有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。結論中西醫結閤康複護理療法優于西醫治療。
목적：관찰중서의결합강복호리대결혈성중풍치료적림상효과。방법120례병례수궤분위대조화치료조。전자채용서의요법，후자채용중서의결합강복호리，료정균위14 d。결과치료후량조총유효솔분별위91.67%、76.67%，구유현저성차이(P<0.05)。결론중서의결합강복호리요법우우서의치료。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of combined with rehabilitation nursing on the treatment of ischemic stroke of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine. Methods 120 patients were randomly divided into control and treatment groups. The former useswestern medicine therapy, which is the combination of Chinese and Western medicine rehabilitation nursing, treatment for 14 days. Results After treatment, the total efifciency of two groups were 91.67%, 76.67%, with a signiifcant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Rehabilitation therapy is better than western medicine treatment conclusion combined traditional Chinese and Western medicine.
