北方法学
北方法學
북방법학
NORTHERN LEGAL SCIENCE
2014年
1期
79-90
,共12页
政策%行政诉讼%司法解释
政策%行政訴訟%司法解釋
정책%행정소송%사법해석
policy%administrative litigations%judicial interpretation
政策在行政诉讼中的适用实践比理论活跃,我国目前的影子性规定与司法审查根据的实际地位比较尴尬,政策在行政诉讼中适用具有合理性与特殊性,而西方法理学上的观点给予我们诸多启示,值得借鉴,确立政策在行政诉讼适用中的审查对象与审判依据的合理地位,并通过建立法律推理、司法解释、判例指导等制度予以保障是可行的做法。
政策在行政訴訟中的適用實踐比理論活躍,我國目前的影子性規定與司法審查根據的實際地位比較尷尬,政策在行政訴訟中適用具有閤理性與特殊性,而西方法理學上的觀點給予我們諸多啟示,值得藉鑒,確立政策在行政訴訟適用中的審查對象與審判依據的閤理地位,併通過建立法律推理、司法解釋、判例指導等製度予以保障是可行的做法。
정책재행정소송중적괄용실천비이론활약,아국목전적영자성규정여사법심사근거적실제지위비교감개,정책재행정소송중괄용구유합이성여특수성,이서방법이학상적관점급여아문제다계시,치득차감,학립정책재행정소송괄용중적심사대상여심판의거적합리지위,병통과건입법률추리、사법해석、판례지도등제도여이보장시가행적주법。
Application of policy in administrative litigations is more active in practice than in theory .In China , the actual status of shadow regulations and the basis of judicial review are rather embarrassing .Appli-cation of policy in administrative litigations bears features of rationality and specificity , and theories from west-ern jurisprudence have brought lots of inspiration which is worth learning .It is feasible to establish a reasona-ble status for application of policy in administrative litigations as investigation objects and trial basis , and to make guarantee measures by means of rules of legal reasoning , judicial interpretation and precedent guide-lines.