中国医药
中國醫藥
중국의약
CHINA MEDICINE
2013年
12期
1708-1710
,共3页
孙学飞%张同军%靳红绪%王福朝%郑英霞%赵津津%王忠义%刘学锋
孫學飛%張同軍%靳紅緒%王福朝%鄭英霞%趙津津%王忠義%劉學鋒
손학비%장동군%근홍서%왕복조%정영하%조진진%왕충의%류학봉
咪达唑仑%氟马西尼%静脉麻醉%悬雍垂腭咽成形术%苏醒质量
咪達唑崙%氟馬西尼%靜脈痳醉%懸雍垂腭嚥成形術%囌醒質量
미체서륜%불마서니%정맥마취%현옹수악인성형술%소성질량
Midazolam%Flumazenil%Intravenous anesthesia%Uvula palate pharyngoplasty%Awaking quality
目的 观察咪达唑仑联合氟马西尼用于悬雍垂腭咽成形术麻醉苏醒期的安全性及有效性.方法 将行悬雍垂腭咽成形术的患者40例采用随机数字表法随机分为咪达唑仑组和丙泊酚组,各20例.2组患者均采用镇静健忘慢诱导行鼻腔插管,麻醉维持:咪达唑仑组以咪达唑仑0.1 ~0.2 mg/(kg·h)恒速泵入维持术中镇静;丙泊酚组以丙泊酚4~6 mg/kg恒速泵入维持术中镇静;2组患者术中均以瑞芬太尼0.2~0.4 μg/(kg·min)恒速泵入维持镇痛,间断静脉注射罗库溴铵维持肌松.手术结束后咪达唑仑组静脉注射氟马西尼至患者清醒.记录2组患者的入室时、插管即刻、拔管即刻、出室时的血流动力学变化;记录自主呼吸恢复时间、呼唤睁眼时间、拔管时间、警觉与镇静评分(OAA/S评分)情况以及达5分时间;记录患者不良反应情况.结果 2组患者各时间点平均动脉压(MAP)和HR比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与入室时比较,诱导后MAP和HR均有所下降(P<0.05);2组患者自主呼吸恢复时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).咪达唑仑组患者呼唤睁眼时间[(2.9±0.5)min]、拔管时间[(5.4±1.2)min]及OAA/S评分达5分时间[(7.0±1.5)min]明显短于丙泊酚组[(10.1±2.0)min,(12.6 ±2.3) min,(13.6 ±3.1)min](均P<O.05);2组患者在苏醒期躁动/呛咳发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),2组患者拔管后均未发生再镇静及呼吸道梗阻,术后2组患者恶心呕吐发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 咪达唑仑联合氟马西尼用于悬雍垂腭咽成形术麻醉可缩短患者的清醒时间,提高苏醒期的质量,是一种安全、有效的麻醉方法.
目的 觀察咪達唑崙聯閤氟馬西尼用于懸雍垂腭嚥成形術痳醉囌醒期的安全性及有效性.方法 將行懸雍垂腭嚥成形術的患者40例採用隨機數字錶法隨機分為咪達唑崙組和丙泊酚組,各20例.2組患者均採用鎮靜健忘慢誘導行鼻腔插管,痳醉維持:咪達唑崙組以咪達唑崙0.1 ~0.2 mg/(kg·h)恆速泵入維持術中鎮靜;丙泊酚組以丙泊酚4~6 mg/kg恆速泵入維持術中鎮靜;2組患者術中均以瑞芬太尼0.2~0.4 μg/(kg·min)恆速泵入維持鎮痛,間斷靜脈註射囉庫溴銨維持肌鬆.手術結束後咪達唑崙組靜脈註射氟馬西尼至患者清醒.記錄2組患者的入室時、插管即刻、拔管即刻、齣室時的血流動力學變化;記錄自主呼吸恢複時間、呼喚睜眼時間、拔管時間、警覺與鎮靜評分(OAA/S評分)情況以及達5分時間;記錄患者不良反應情況.結果 2組患者各時間點平均動脈壓(MAP)和HR比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),與入室時比較,誘導後MAP和HR均有所下降(P<0.05);2組患者自主呼吸恢複時間比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).咪達唑崙組患者呼喚睜眼時間[(2.9±0.5)min]、拔管時間[(5.4±1.2)min]及OAA/S評分達5分時間[(7.0±1.5)min]明顯短于丙泊酚組[(10.1±2.0)min,(12.6 ±2.3) min,(13.6 ±3.1)min](均P<O.05);2組患者在囌醒期躁動/嗆咳髮生率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),2組患者拔管後均未髮生再鎮靜及呼吸道梗阻,術後2組患者噁心嘔吐髮生率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 咪達唑崙聯閤氟馬西尼用于懸雍垂腭嚥成形術痳醉可縮短患者的清醒時間,提高囌醒期的質量,是一種安全、有效的痳醉方法.
목적 관찰미체서륜연합불마서니용우현옹수악인성형술마취소성기적안전성급유효성.방법 장행현옹수악인성형술적환자40례채용수궤수자표법수궤분위미체서륜조화병박분조,각20례.2조환자균채용진정건망만유도행비강삽관,마취유지:미체서륜조이미체서륜0.1 ~0.2 mg/(kg·h)항속빙입유지술중진정;병박분조이병박분4~6 mg/kg항속빙입유지술중진정;2조환자술중균이서분태니0.2~0.4 μg/(kg·min)항속빙입유지진통,간단정맥주사라고추안유지기송.수술결속후미체서륜조정맥주사불마서니지환자청성.기록2조환자적입실시、삽관즉각、발관즉각、출실시적혈류동역학변화;기록자주호흡회복시간、호환정안시간、발관시간、경각여진정평분(OAA/S평분)정황이급체5분시간;기록환자불량반응정황.결과 2조환자각시간점평균동맥압(MAP)화HR비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),여입실시비교,유도후MAP화HR균유소하강(P<0.05);2조환자자주호흡회복시간비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).미체서륜조환자호환정안시간[(2.9±0.5)min]、발관시간[(5.4±1.2)min]급OAA/S평분체5분시간[(7.0±1.5)min]명현단우병박분조[(10.1±2.0)min,(12.6 ±2.3) min,(13.6 ±3.1)min](균P<O.05);2조환자재소성기조동/창해발생솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),2조환자발관후균미발생재진정급호흡도경조,술후2조환자악심구토발생솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 미체서륜연합불마서니용우현옹수악인성형술마취가축단환자적청성시간,제고소성기적질량,시일충안전、유효적마취방법.
Objective To observe the safety and effectiveness of midazolam-flumazenil for uvula palate pharyngoplasty anesthesia in recovery period.Methods Forty cases scheduled for UPPP surgery were selected and randomly divided into midazolam group (group M,n =20) and propofol group (group P,n =20).Two groups were treated with sedation induced and nasal intubation.Intraoperative sedation was maintained in group M with midazolam 0.1-0.2 mg/(kg · h) constant speed pump; group P was given propofol 4-6 mg/kg to maintain constant speed pump.Intraoperative constant analgesic of two groups was maintained with remifentanil 0.2-0.4 μg/(kg · min) pumped.Intermittent intravenous rocuronium was maintained muscle relaxation.After surgery the patients of group M were intravenous injected of flumazenil to awake.The hemodynamic changes when entering the operating room,intubation,extubation and out of the operating room were recorded.The time of spontaneous breathing recovery,calling eye opening,extubation and OAA/S score as well as up to 5 points time were recorded; adverse reactions were recorded.Results The difference of two groups' mean artery pressure(MAP) and HR at each time point was not statistically different (P > 0.05).Compared with the time entering the operating room,MAP and heart rate (HR) decreased after the induction (P < 0.05) ; the difference of spontaneous breathing recovery time of two groups was not statistically different (P > 0.05).Calling eye opening time [(2.9 ± 0.5) min],extubation time [(5.4 ±1.2) min] and the time to 5 points of OAA/S score [(7.0 ± 1.5) min] in group M was significantly shorter in group P [(10.1 ± 2.0) min,(12.6 ± 2.3) min,(13.6 ± 3.1) min] (all P < 0.05).The incidence of restlessness/cough of two groups in recovery period was no significant different (P > 0.05).Two groups did not occur sedation again and respiratory obstruction after extubation.The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and intraoperative awareness was no significantly different (P > 0.05).Conclusion Midazolam-flumazenil for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty' anesthesia can shorten the recovery time and improve the quality of recovery.