湖北经济学院学报
湖北經濟學院學報
호북경제학원학보
JOURNAL OF HUBER UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS
2012年
2期
44-52
,共9页
农村劳动力%转移%城乡实际收入差距%城镇失业率
農村勞動力%轉移%城鄉實際收入差距%城鎮失業率
농촌노동력%전이%성향실제수입차거%성진실업솔
urban-rural labor mobility%influencing factors%urban-rural actual income gap%urban unemployment rate
结合中国实际情况,对哈里斯-托达罗模型的基本假设进行修定,从农民追求预期净收益现值最大化出发,运用动态宏观经济学的递归方法,推导出均衡条件下中国城乡劳动力流动影响因素的理论模型,并采用动态面板计量方法实证检验各影响因素对城乡劳动力流动的作用方向和程度。研究发现:城乡劳动力流动率的滞后值、城乡实际收入差距、非农产值比和农业比较劳动生产率对城乡劳动力流动有正的影响,但城乡实际收入差距的影响系数值偏小;城镇失业率、城乡消费支出比和农村工业化对城乡劳动力流动有负的影响;制度变迁和全社会固定资产投资率对城乡劳动力流动也有一定程度但不显著的正影响。为了解决农民工就业问题,应加强城乡联动共同发展。
結閤中國實際情況,對哈裏斯-託達囉模型的基本假設進行脩定,從農民追求預期淨收益現值最大化齣髮,運用動態宏觀經濟學的遞歸方法,推導齣均衡條件下中國城鄉勞動力流動影響因素的理論模型,併採用動態麵闆計量方法實證檢驗各影響因素對城鄉勞動力流動的作用方嚮和程度。研究髮現:城鄉勞動力流動率的滯後值、城鄉實際收入差距、非農產值比和農業比較勞動生產率對城鄉勞動力流動有正的影響,但城鄉實際收入差距的影響繫數值偏小;城鎮失業率、城鄉消費支齣比和農村工業化對城鄉勞動力流動有負的影響;製度變遷和全社會固定資產投資率對城鄉勞動力流動也有一定程度但不顯著的正影響。為瞭解決農民工就業問題,應加彊城鄉聯動共同髮展。
결합중국실제정황,대합리사-탁체라모형적기본가설진행수정,종농민추구예기정수익현치최대화출발,운용동태굉관경제학적체귀방법,추도출균형조건하중국성향노동력류동영향인소적이론모형,병채용동태면판계량방법실증검험각영향인소대성향노동력류동적작용방향화정도。연구발현:성향노동력류동솔적체후치、성향실제수입차거、비농산치비화농업비교노동생산솔대성향노동력류동유정적영향,단성향실제수입차거적영향계수치편소;성진실업솔、성향소비지출비화농촌공업화대성향노동력류동유부적영향;제도변천화전사회고정자산투자솔대성향노동력류동야유일정정도단불현저적정영향。위료해결농민공취업문제,응가강성향련동공동발전。
Combining with the actual situation in China,from farmers maximizing the present value of expected net revenue,the paper fixes the basic assumptions on Harris-Todaro model to derive the theoretical model of influencing factors of Chinese urban-rural labor mobility under equilibrium conditions by using the recursive method of dynamic macroeconomics,and conducts the empirical study on the influence direction and degree of the influencing factors on urban-rural labor mobility by using the Dynamic Panel Data econometrics method,we find that:the lag value of urban-rural labor mobility rate,urban-rural actual income gap,nonagricultural output ratio and agricultural comparative labor productivity has a positive impact on urban-rural labor mobility,but the influence coefficient of urban-rural income gap is small;urban unemployment rate,urban-rural consumption expenditure ratio and rural industrialization has a negative impact on urban-rural labor mobility;To some extent but not significantly,institutional change and whole social fixed assets investment rate has positive impact on urban-rural labor mobility.Finally,the empirical results are still explained.