中国动物检疫
中國動物檢疫
중국동물검역
CHINA ANMAL QUARANTINE
2014年
8期
22-23,35
,共3页
李小卫%杨德茂%李方新%苏传勇
李小衛%楊德茂%李方新%囌傳勇
리소위%양덕무%리방신%소전용
检疫监督%种蛋%案例%思考
檢疫鑑督%種蛋%案例%思攷
검역감독%충단%안례%사고
inspection supervision%hatching egg%case%law-enforcement
动物卫生监督所执法人员对曾某经营未经检疫的种蛋违法案件进行行政处罚,曾某不服先后向江西省宁都县人民法院和赣州市中级人民法院上诉,辩称其孵化的种蛋不属于《动物防疫法》规定的检疫对象,执法人员没有出示官方兽医证件,不属官方兽医,不具备实施动物、动物产品检疫监督执法的资格。二审法院审理认为宁都县动物卫生监督所作出的行政处罚事实清楚,证据充分,程序得当,适用法律准确,最终判决曾某败诉。本案中曾某二次上诉的原因,是其对有关法律法规条款有误读,此案例可为执法人员提供参考。
動物衛生鑑督所執法人員對曾某經營未經檢疫的種蛋違法案件進行行政處罰,曾某不服先後嚮江西省寧都縣人民法院和贛州市中級人民法院上訴,辯稱其孵化的種蛋不屬于《動物防疫法》規定的檢疫對象,執法人員沒有齣示官方獸醫證件,不屬官方獸醫,不具備實施動物、動物產品檢疫鑑督執法的資格。二審法院審理認為寧都縣動物衛生鑑督所作齣的行政處罰事實清楚,證據充分,程序得噹,適用法律準確,最終判決曾某敗訴。本案中曾某二次上訴的原因,是其對有關法律法規條款有誤讀,此案例可為執法人員提供參攷。
동물위생감독소집법인원대증모경영미경검역적충단위법안건진행행정처벌,증모불복선후향강서성저도현인민법원화공주시중급인민법원상소,변칭기부화적충단불속우《동물방역법》규정적검역대상,집법인원몰유출시관방수의증건,불속관방수의,불구비실시동물、동물산품검역감독집법적자격。이심법원심리인위저도현동물위생감독소작출적행정처벌사실청초,증거충분,정서득당,괄용법률준학,최종판결증모패소。본안중증모이차상소적원인,시기대유관법율법규조관유오독,차안례가위집법인원제공삼고。
Mr. Zeng was administratively sanctioned by the law-enforcement staff from Ningdu County Animal Health Supervision Institute,Jiangxi Province due to his operation with hatching eggs,which shall be legally inspected but not. Mr. Zeng refused to comply and appealed to the Ningdu County People’s Court and Ganzhow City Intermediate People’s Court,claiming that his lot of hatching eggs does not belong to the quarantine object as speciifed in The Law on Animal Disease Prevention,the law-enforcement staff have not shown the ofifcial veterinarian certiifcates,so they are not ofifcial veterinarians and are not qualiifed to implement the animal and animal product quarantine and inspection. After hearing,the court of second instance considered that the administrative sanction made by Ningdu County Animal Health Supervision Institute is based on the clear facts,enough evidence,proper procedures and the accurate applicable laws,and ifnally decided that Mr. Zeng loses the law-suite. Reason for Mr. Zeng’s frequent appeals was his misunderstanding of the related laws and regulations.