CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨护理干预对门诊输液室患者的作用.方法将2009年1月-2010年6月在我院急诊输液室患者128例,按照就诊顺序随机分成干预组和对照组,每组64例.对照组给予常规的护理措施,而干预组在此基础上给予心理干预.观察并比较两组的干预效果.结果干预后患者的SAS评分和HAMA评分均有所降低.干预后心理干预组的得分明显低于对照组,两组间的差异也具有显著性(P＜0.05).心理干预组的总体满意率为90.625%,而对照组为76.56%,心理干预组的总体满意率显著高于对照组(P＜0.05).结论对输液患者在基础护理上实施心理护理措施,能有效改善患者的不良情绪,增加患者满意度,值得在输液中进一步推广.
목적 탐토호리간예대문진수액실환자적작용.방법 장2009년1월-2010년6월재아원급진수액실환자128례,안조취진순서수궤분성간예조화대조조,매조64례.대조조급여상규적호리조시,이간예조재차기출상급여심리간예.관찰병비교량조적간예효과.결과 간예후환자적SAS평분화HAMA평분균유소강저.간예후심리간예조적득분명현저우대조조,량조간적차이야구유현저성(P＜0.05).심리간예조적총체만의솔위90.625%,이대조조위76.56%,심리간예조적총체만의솔현저고우대조조(P＜0.05).결론 대수액환자재기출호리상실시심리호리조시,능유효개선환자적불량정서,증가환자만의도,치득재수액중진일보추엄.
Objective To investigate the effect of nursing intervention on outpatient infusion patients. Methods 128patients treated in emergency room in our hospital from January 2009 to June 2010, were randomly divided into intervention group and control group according to the treatment, 64 patients for each group. Control group received routine nursing care, while the intervention group was given psychological intervention on this basis. We observed and compared the intervention effect of two groups. Results The SAS scores and HAMA scores after intervention were all decreased. The intervention group scores were significantly lower than those of the control group after psychological intervention (P＜ 0.05). Overall satisfaction rate of psychological intervention group was 90.625%, while the control group with 76.56%, the intervention group was significantly higher than that of control group. Conclusion Psychological care measures to infusion patients can improve the negative emotions of patients, and increase their saris faction degree, which is worth further promotion in the infusion.