中国考试
中國攷試
중국고시
CHINA EXAMINATIONS
2012年
10期
18-24
,共7页
教育测量%短测验%菲参数项目反应理论%摩根模型
教育測量%短測驗%菲參數項目反應理論%摩根模型
교육측량%단측험%비삼수항목반응이론%마근모형
Educational Measure%Short Yest%Non-parameter Item Response Theory%Mokken Model
教育考试中专题、短测验等形式是命题的一种主要方式。对这类测验的分析,可以从参数项目反应理论和非参数项目反应理论入手。本研究分别选取Rasch模型和Mokken模型对某高三文科综合地理试卷进行分析比较。使用winsteps和xeaaibre软件进行Rasch分析,得到难度、信息量、项目功能差异等参数;使用MSP软件进行Mokken分析,得到正答率和同质性系数。比较两种结果,得出以下结论:(1)非参数项目反应理论以正答率对题目排序与参数项目反应理论以难度排序一致;(2)而有个别不符合参数项目反应理论标准的题目对提高测验质量同样有意义,不应被删除;(3)进行维度检验和题目筛选时,非参数项目反应理论标准比参数项目反应理论标准更加严格;(4)两种理论的项目功能差异检验结果一致。
教育攷試中專題、短測驗等形式是命題的一種主要方式。對這類測驗的分析,可以從參數項目反應理論和非參數項目反應理論入手。本研究分彆選取Rasch模型和Mokken模型對某高三文科綜閤地理試捲進行分析比較。使用winsteps和xeaaibre軟件進行Rasch分析,得到難度、信息量、項目功能差異等參數;使用MSP軟件進行Mokken分析,得到正答率和同質性繫數。比較兩種結果,得齣以下結論:(1)非參數項目反應理論以正答率對題目排序與參數項目反應理論以難度排序一緻;(2)而有箇彆不符閤參數項目反應理論標準的題目對提高測驗質量同樣有意義,不應被刪除;(3)進行維度檢驗和題目篩選時,非參數項目反應理論標準比參數項目反應理論標準更加嚴格;(4)兩種理論的項目功能差異檢驗結果一緻。
교육고시중전제、단측험등형식시명제적일충주요방식。대저류측험적분석,가이종삼수항목반응이론화비삼수항목반응이론입수。본연구분별선취Rasch모형화Mokken모형대모고삼문과종합지리시권진행분석비교。사용winsteps화xeaaibre연건진행Rasch분석,득도난도、신식량、항목공능차이등삼수;사용MSP연건진행Mokken분석,득도정답솔화동질성계수。비교량충결과,득출이하결론:(1)비삼수항목반응이론이정답솔대제목배서여삼수항목반응이론이난도배서일치;(2)이유개별불부합삼수항목반응이론표준적제목대제고측험질량동양유의의,불응피산제;(3)진행유도검험화제목사선시,비삼수항목반응이론표준비삼수항목반응이론표준경가엄격;(4)량충이론적항목공능차이검험결과일치。
As one of the significant types of tests, the test project and short test are popular in educational testing. Parameter and non-parameter item response theory being the starts, these tests were under analysis. Compared was the geography paper in inaugurated arts taken by some senior three students. During this comparison the Rasch and Mokken model were respectively selected. For analyzing software Winsteps and Xcalibre were utilized to analyze item parameters in Rasch model. Analyzed in detail were the parameters of difficulty, differential item functioning and information curve. Software MSP was for the purpose of analyzing items in Mokken model. Besides, the statistics of accurate rate and coefficients of homogeneity were also analyzed in detail. Finally, four conclusions were arrived at as the following: ( 1 ) The estimate results of difficulty between non-parameter and parameter item response theory were equivalent. (2)Those items, which failed to fit parameter item response theory, succeeded in non-parameter item response theory. (3)Non-parameter item response theory is more rigorous than parameter item response theory in dimension testing and item screening. (4)The result was equivalent in the detection for differential item functioning between non-parameter and parameter item response theory.