沈阳农业大学学报:社会科学版
瀋暘農業大學學報:社會科學版
침양농업대학학보:사회과학판
Social Science Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University
2012年
3期
360-364
,共5页
乡村%景观设计%模糊综合评价%园林工程%优化
鄉村%景觀設計%模糊綜閤評價%園林工程%優化
향촌%경관설계%모호종합평개%완림공정%우화
rural area%landscape design%fuzzy comprehensive evaluation%garden project%optimization
在对影响乡村景观设计方案各项因素进行综合分析的基础上,运用AHP-模糊综合评价法构造了乡村景观设计方案评价模型。首先建构了“目标层一指标层次结构”,采用专家打分法建立判断矩阵,计算出相对权重,并通过两级的模糊综合评价,然后确定出每个设计方案的各因素分值和综合评价分值,作为乡村景观设计方案评价和优化的理论依据。以福建省某乡村景观设计为研究对象,对此实例的四个设计方案进行了评价验证和优化研究,结果表明,采用AHP-模糊综合评价法对乡村景观设计方案进行评价与分析是客观公正、可行有效的,根据综合评价最高分值优选出来的方案明显优于其他设计方案,并能从各因素的分值对比中得到良好的优化建议。
在對影響鄉村景觀設計方案各項因素進行綜閤分析的基礎上,運用AHP-模糊綜閤評價法構造瞭鄉村景觀設計方案評價模型。首先建構瞭“目標層一指標層次結構”,採用專傢打分法建立判斷矩陣,計算齣相對權重,併通過兩級的模糊綜閤評價,然後確定齣每箇設計方案的各因素分值和綜閤評價分值,作為鄉村景觀設計方案評價和優化的理論依據。以福建省某鄉村景觀設計為研究對象,對此實例的四箇設計方案進行瞭評價驗證和優化研究,結果錶明,採用AHP-模糊綜閤評價法對鄉村景觀設計方案進行評價與分析是客觀公正、可行有效的,根據綜閤評價最高分值優選齣來的方案明顯優于其他設計方案,併能從各因素的分值對比中得到良好的優化建議。
재대영향향촌경관설계방안각항인소진행종합분석적기출상,운용AHP-모호종합평개법구조료향촌경관설계방안평개모형。수선건구료“목표층일지표층차결구”,채용전가타분법건립판단구진,계산출상대권중,병통과량급적모호종합평개,연후학정출매개설계방안적각인소분치화종합평개분치,작위향촌경관설계방안평개화우화적이론의거。이복건성모향촌경관설계위연구대상,대차실례적사개설계방안진행료평개험증화우화연구,결과표명,채용AHP-모호종합평개법대향촌경관설계방안진행평개여분석시객관공정、가행유효적,근거종합평개최고분치우선출래적방안명현우우기타설계방안,병능종각인소적분치대비중득도량호적우화건의。
On the basis of a comprehensive analysis of the factors that affect the rural landscape design an evaluation model of the rural landscape design program is constructed with the help of the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. According to this model the target layer - indicator hierarchy is constructed, the judgment matrix is established with the expert evaluation method, the relative weights are calculated, and then the factor score and comprehensive evaluation score of each design program are determined by means of the two-grade fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, which are employed as the theoretical basis of the rural landscape design program evaluation and optimization. The landscape design for a village in Fujian province is taken as research object and four different design programs made for the same village are evaluated, examined and optimized as research contents. The results show that the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is objective, feasible and effective. And the design program selected according to the highest comprehensive score is obviously superior to the other design programs and fine suggestions on optimization can be made according to the score comparison between factors.