CAJ | 학술논문

国外一般规定仲裁协议效力由仲裁庭来决定,集中体现为仲裁庭自裁管辖权原则,此原则已得到世界各国的广泛认可。而目前我国将仲裁协议效力的认定主体赋予仲裁委员会和法院,且法院有优先管辖权,这不符合国际商事仲裁的惯例,阻碍了仲裁事业的发展。运用比较分析法去论证我国立法规定的利弊,明确仲裁庭自裁管辖权确立的必要性,有利于完善这一立法。
국외일반규정중재협의효력유중재정래결정,집중체현위중재정자재관할권원칙,차원칙이득도세계각국적엄범인가。이목전아국장중재협의효력적인정주체부여중재위원회화법원,차법원유우선관할권,저불부합국제상사중재적관례,조애료중재사업적발전。운용비교분석법거론증아국입법규정적리폐,명학중재정자재관할권학립적필요성,유리우완선저일입법。
Generally the arbitral tribunal has the power to decide arbitration agreement validity in foreign countries, which is mainly reflected in the principle of jurisdiction?of?.arbitration. This principle has received wide recognition all over the world. However, China's legislation provides both arbitral tribunal and the court have the right to decide the validity of the arbitration agreement, and the court even takes precedence over the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, which is incompatible with the practice of international commercial arbitration. Here, it's necessary to make analysis of the pros and cons of legislation, then put forward establishing the principle of jurisdiction of arbitration, etc.