重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
4期
442-444
,共3页
程洪林%郭闯%李旭明%程宗勇%李锋%张力%李元仲
程洪林%郭闖%李旭明%程宗勇%李鋒%張力%李元仲
정홍림%곽틈%리욱명%정종용%리봉%장력%리원중
输尿管结石%微创经皮肾镜取石术%经尿道输尿管镜
輸尿管結石%微創經皮腎鏡取石術%經尿道輸尿管鏡
수뇨관결석%미창경피신경취석술%경뇨도수뇨관경
ureteral calculi%minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy%ureteroscopic litripsy
目的:探讨经尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术(URL)、微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石合并感染的疗效与安全性。方法回顾分析2007年7月至2011年7月该院收治的输尿管上段嵌顿结石合并感染的共126例,其中58例采用URL ,68例采用MPCNL ,比较两组的手术时间、碎石成功率、结石清除率、术后辅助治疗、术后并发症发生率、住院时间等疗效指标。结果 URL组手术成功48例(碎石成功率为82.76%),MPCNL组手术成功68例(碎石成功率为100.00%);URL组术后1周结石清除率为62.07%(36/58),MPCNL组术后1周结石清除率为98.53%(67/68),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月结石清除率,MPCNL组为100%,较URL组81.03%(47/58)明显提高(P<0.05);URL组术后辅助体外震波碎石治疗率为37.93%(22/58),而MPCNL组为1.47%(1/68),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);URL组和MPCNL组手术时间分别为(65.34±26.72)min和(96.32±30.94)min ,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),URL 组和 MPCNL 组住院时间分别为(4.54±1.87) d和(7.62±1.93) d ,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);URL组和MPCNL组,两组术后高热(T>39.0℃),分别发生5例和6例,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后血培养阳性,URL组和MPCNL组分别为2例和3例,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);URL组和MPCNL组术后血红蛋白下降发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 MPCNL较URL治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石合并感染,具有更高的手术成功率和结石清除率,安全有效,是治疗输尿管上段嵌顿结石合并感染的首选疗法。
目的:探討經尿道輸尿管鏡氣壓彈道碎石術(URL)、微創經皮腎鏡取石術(MPCNL)治療輸尿管上段嵌頓結石閤併感染的療效與安全性。方法迴顧分析2007年7月至2011年7月該院收治的輸尿管上段嵌頓結石閤併感染的共126例,其中58例採用URL ,68例採用MPCNL ,比較兩組的手術時間、碎石成功率、結石清除率、術後輔助治療、術後併髮癥髮生率、住院時間等療效指標。結果 URL組手術成功48例(碎石成功率為82.76%),MPCNL組手術成功68例(碎石成功率為100.00%);URL組術後1週結石清除率為62.07%(36/58),MPCNL組術後1週結石清除率為98.53%(67/68),兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);術後1箇月結石清除率,MPCNL組為100%,較URL組81.03%(47/58)明顯提高(P<0.05);URL組術後輔助體外震波碎石治療率為37.93%(22/58),而MPCNL組為1.47%(1/68),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);URL組和MPCNL組手術時間分彆為(65.34±26.72)min和(96.32±30.94)min ,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),URL 組和 MPCNL 組住院時間分彆為(4.54±1.87) d和(7.62±1.93) d ,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);URL組和MPCNL組,兩組術後高熱(T>39.0℃),分彆髮生5例和6例,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);術後血培養暘性,URL組和MPCNL組分彆為2例和3例,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);URL組和MPCNL組術後血紅蛋白下降髮生率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論 MPCNL較URL治療輸尿管上段嵌頓結石閤併感染,具有更高的手術成功率和結石清除率,安全有效,是治療輸尿管上段嵌頓結石閤併感染的首選療法。
목적:탐토경뇨도수뇨관경기압탄도쇄석술(URL)、미창경피신경취석술(MPCNL)치료수뇨관상단감돈결석합병감염적료효여안전성。방법회고분석2007년7월지2011년7월해원수치적수뇨관상단감돈결석합병감염적공126례,기중58례채용URL ,68례채용MPCNL ,비교량조적수술시간、쇄석성공솔、결석청제솔、술후보조치료、술후병발증발생솔、주원시간등료효지표。결과 URL조수술성공48례(쇄석성공솔위82.76%),MPCNL조수술성공68례(쇄석성공솔위100.00%);URL조술후1주결석청제솔위62.07%(36/58),MPCNL조술후1주결석청제솔위98.53%(67/68),량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);술후1개월결석청제솔,MPCNL조위100%,교URL조81.03%(47/58)명현제고(P<0.05);URL조술후보조체외진파쇄석치료솔위37.93%(22/58),이MPCNL조위1.47%(1/68),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);URL조화MPCNL조수술시간분별위(65.34±26.72)min화(96.32±30.94)min ,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),URL 조화 MPCNL 조주원시간분별위(4.54±1.87) d화(7.62±1.93) d ,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);URL조화MPCNL조,량조술후고열(T>39.0℃),분별발생5례화6례,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);술후혈배양양성,URL조화MPCNL조분별위2례화3례,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);URL조화MPCNL조술후혈홍단백하강발생솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론 MPCNL교URL치료수뇨관상단감돈결석합병감염,구유경고적수술성공솔화결석청제솔,안전유효,시치료수뇨관상단감돈결석합병감염적수선요법。
Objective To explore the safety and efficiency of patients with impacted upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection treated by ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy (URL ) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) .Methods 126 cases of impacted upper ureteral calculi combined with renal intrarenal infection were treated in this hos-pita1 from July 2007 to July 2011 ,including 58 cases of URL ,68 cases of MPCNL .The success rate of primary lithotripsy ,stone-free rate ,postoperative adjuvant therapy ,operative time ,hospital stay ,incidence of postoperative complications and other data were analyzed .Results The success rate of group URL was 82 .76% (48/58) ,the success rate of group MPCNL was 100 .00% .The stone-free rate seven day after operation :URL was 62 .07% (36/58) ,MPCNL was 98 .53% (67/68)(P<0 .05) .The stone-free rate was 100 .00% in MPCNL group and 81 .03% in URL group one month After operation(P<0 .05) .In MPCNL group ,the rate of adjuvant ESWL was 1 .47% ,significantly lower than 37 .93% in URL group(P<0 .05) .In URL group the operative time (65 .34 ± 26 .72)min and hospital stay(4 .54 ± 1 .87)d were significantly shorter than those (96 .32 ± 30 .94)min and(7 .62 ± 1 .93)d in URL group(P<0 .05) .After the operation ,in MPCNL group ,6 patients developed high fever ,in URL group ,5 patients had high fever (P<0 .05) .Culture of blood after operation found 3 patients and 2 patients in MPCNL group and URL group were positive(P<0 .05) .There were no significant differences in the rates of hemoglobin decline between the two groups (P>0 .05) .Conclusion It has higher successful rate and stone-free rate in patients with upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection by MPCNL than those treated by URL .The safety and efficency of the former is better that of the latter .MPCNL can be the first choice for the upper ureter calculus combined with renal intrarenal infection .