国际麻醉学与复苏杂志
國際痳醉學與複囌雜誌
국제마취학여복소잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION
2014年
2期
127-130
,共4页
王长明%蔡长华%张静%刘辉%庞庆贵%王嵘巍%刘艳芳%尹美华%马逸
王長明%蔡長華%張靜%劉輝%龐慶貴%王嶸巍%劉豔芳%尹美華%馬逸
왕장명%채장화%장정%류휘%방경귀%왕영외%류염방%윤미화%마일
地佐辛%微血管减压术%面肌痉挛%苏醒期%超前镇痛
地佐辛%微血管減壓術%麵肌痙攣%囌醒期%超前鎮痛
지좌신%미혈관감압술%면기경련%소성기%초전진통
Dezocine%Microvascular decompression%Hemifacial spasm%Recovery%Preemptive analgesia
目的 探讨地佐辛超前镇痛对显微血管减压术(microvascular decompression,MVD)治疗面肌痉挛苏醒期的影响.方法 32例择期行MVD治疗面肌痉挛手术患者,按随机数字表法分为实验组(Ⅰ组)和对照组(Ⅱ组),每组16例:Ⅰ组术毕前30 min静注5 mg/2 ml地佐辛;Ⅱ组术毕前30 min静注2ml生理盐水.观察术后苏醒时间、拔出喉罩后10 min疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Ramsay镇静评分及拔出喉罩即刻躁动评分(riker agitation-sedation scale,RSS)及麻醉前(T0,基础值)、拔出喉罩前5min(T1)、拔出喉罩即刻(T2)、拔出喉罩后10min(T3)时平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heart rate,HR)、脉搏血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2).结果 术后苏醒时间、Ramsay镇静评分,Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组之间在T2 RSS评分[(0.62±0.11),(2.83±0.24)分]及在T3VAS评分[(1.04±0.22),(3.30±0.41)分]之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);MAP、HR,Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组之间T0和T1差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),Ⅰ组T2和T3 MAP[(96.6±1.1),(94.7±1.1) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)]、HR[(81.4±1.7),(78.0±1.2)次/min]与Ⅱ组T2和T3 MAP[(104.9±1.5)、(100.9±1.2) mmHg]、HR[(87.7±2.0)、(85.0±1.9)次/min]比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).Ⅱ组内T2和T3 MAP[(104.9±1.5)、(100.9±1.2) mmHg]、HR[(87.7±2.0)、(85.0±1.9) 次/min]与T0MAP[(95.5±2.0) mmHg]、HR[(81.8±2.6)次/min]比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),Sp02两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者在苏醒期阶段均无发生呼吸抑制、恶心呕吐、畏寒发热等并发症.结论 地佐辛超前镇痛能够有效减轻MVD治疗面肌痉挛苏醒期的疼痛、降低拔喉罩即刻躁动发生率及维持苏醒期血流动力学的稳定.
目的 探討地佐辛超前鎮痛對顯微血管減壓術(microvascular decompression,MVD)治療麵肌痙攣囌醒期的影響.方法 32例擇期行MVD治療麵肌痙攣手術患者,按隨機數字錶法分為實驗組(Ⅰ組)和對照組(Ⅱ組),每組16例:Ⅰ組術畢前30 min靜註5 mg/2 ml地佐辛;Ⅱ組術畢前30 min靜註2ml生理鹽水.觀察術後囌醒時間、拔齣喉罩後10 min疼痛視覺模擬評分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Ramsay鎮靜評分及拔齣喉罩即刻躁動評分(riker agitation-sedation scale,RSS)及痳醉前(T0,基礎值)、拔齣喉罩前5min(T1)、拔齣喉罩即刻(T2)、拔齣喉罩後10min(T3)時平均動脈壓(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heart rate,HR)、脈搏血氧飽和度(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2).結果 術後囌醒時間、Ramsay鎮靜評分,Ⅰ組與Ⅱ組之間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);Ⅰ組與Ⅱ組之間在T2 RSS評分[(0.62±0.11),(2.83±0.24)分]及在T3VAS評分[(1.04±0.22),(3.30±0.41)分]之間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);MAP、HR,Ⅰ組與Ⅱ組之間T0和T1差異無統計學意義(p>0.05),Ⅰ組T2和T3 MAP[(96.6±1.1),(94.7±1.1) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)]、HR[(81.4±1.7),(78.0±1.2)次/min]與Ⅱ組T2和T3 MAP[(104.9±1.5)、(100.9±1.2) mmHg]、HR[(87.7±2.0)、(85.0±1.9)次/min]比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).Ⅱ組內T2和T3 MAP[(104.9±1.5)、(100.9±1.2) mmHg]、HR[(87.7±2.0)、(85.0±1.9) 次/min]與T0MAP[(95.5±2.0) mmHg]、HR[(81.8±2.6)次/min]比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),Sp02兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).兩組患者在囌醒期階段均無髮生呼吸抑製、噁心嘔吐、畏寒髮熱等併髮癥.結論 地佐辛超前鎮痛能夠有效減輕MVD治療麵肌痙攣囌醒期的疼痛、降低拔喉罩即刻躁動髮生率及維持囌醒期血流動力學的穩定.
목적 탐토지좌신초전진통대현미혈관감압술(microvascular decompression,MVD)치료면기경련소성기적영향.방법 32례택기행MVD치료면기경련수술환자,안수궤수자표법분위실험조(Ⅰ조)화대조조(Ⅱ조),매조16례:Ⅰ조술필전30 min정주5 mg/2 ml지좌신;Ⅱ조술필전30 min정주2ml생리염수.관찰술후소성시간、발출후조후10 min동통시각모의평분(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Ramsay진정평분급발출후조즉각조동평분(riker agitation-sedation scale,RSS)급마취전(T0,기출치)、발출후조전5min(T1)、발출후조즉각(T2)、발출후조후10min(T3)시평균동맥압(mean arterial pressure,MAP)、심솔(heart rate,HR)、맥박혈양포화도(pulse oxygen saturation,SpO2).결과 술후소성시간、Ramsay진정평분,Ⅰ조여Ⅱ조지간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);Ⅰ조여Ⅱ조지간재T2 RSS평분[(0.62±0.11),(2.83±0.24)분]급재T3VAS평분[(1.04±0.22),(3.30±0.41)분]지간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);MAP、HR,Ⅰ조여Ⅱ조지간T0화T1차이무통계학의의(p>0.05),Ⅰ조T2화T3 MAP[(96.6±1.1),(94.7±1.1) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)]、HR[(81.4±1.7),(78.0±1.2)차/min]여Ⅱ조T2화T3 MAP[(104.9±1.5)、(100.9±1.2) mmHg]、HR[(87.7±2.0)、(85.0±1.9)차/min]비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).Ⅱ조내T2화T3 MAP[(104.9±1.5)、(100.9±1.2) mmHg]、HR[(87.7±2.0)、(85.0±1.9) 차/min]여T0MAP[(95.5±2.0) mmHg]、HR[(81.8±2.6)차/min]비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),Sp02량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).량조환자재소성기계단균무발생호흡억제、악심구토、외한발열등병발증.결론 지좌신초전진통능구유효감경MVD치료면기경련소성기적동통、강저발후조즉각조동발생솔급유지소성기혈류동역학적은정.
Objective To explore effect of dezocine preemptive analgesia on microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm in anesthesia recovery period.Methods Thirty-two patients,who underwent the MVD for hemifacial spasm,were randomly divided into experimental group (group Ⅰ) and control group (group Ⅱ) with 16 patients per group.In group Ⅰ,patients received intravenous injection of dezocine 5 mg/2 ml 30 min before the end of the surgery.While in group Ⅱ,patients received intravenous injection of saline 2 ml 30 min before the end of the surgery.Postoperative recovery time,pain visual analogue scale (VAS) 10 min after extubation and pulling out laryngeal mask immediately riker agitation-sedation scale (RSS) were assessed.Mean arterial pressure (MAP),heart rate (HR) and pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2) were observed before anesthesia (T0,baseline),5 min before pulling out the laryngeal mask (T1),extracting the laryngeal mask immediately (T2) and 10 min after pulling out the laryngeal mask(T3).Results There was no significant difference in postoperative recovery time and Ramsay sedation score between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ (P>0.05).Significant difference between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ in RSS score at T2 [(0.6±0.1),(2.8±0.2) points] and VAS score at T3 [(1.0±0.2),(3.3±0.4) points] were observed.There was no significant difference in MAP and HR at T0 and T1 between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ (P>0.05).From our results,it showed significant differences between group Ⅰ in MAP[(96.6±1.1),(94.7±1.1) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)],HR[(81.4±1.7),(78.0±1.2) bpm] and group Ⅱ in MAP[(104.9±1.5),(100.9±1.2) mmHg],HR[(87.7±2.0),(85.0±1.9) bpm] at T2 and T3.The MAP[(95.5±2.0) mmHg] and HR[(81.8±2.6) bpm] at T0 were compared with T2 and T3 in MAP[(104.9±1.5),(100.9±1.2) mmHg],HR[(87.7±2.0),(85.0±1.9) bpm] in group Ⅱ,which showed significant difference (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in SpO2 (P>0.05).No differences were observed in the complications in recovery stage,such as respiratory depression,nausea and vomiting,chills and fever between the two groups.Conclusions Dezocine for preemptive analgesia can effectively relieve postoperative pain,reduce the incidence of pulling laryngeal mask immediately agitation and maintain hemodynamic stability in the recovery period of patients with MVD for hemifacial spasm.