导弹与航天运载技术
導彈與航天運載技術
도탄여항천운재기술
MISSILES AND SPACE VEHICLES
2014年
2期
58-64
,共7页
李旭东%张杨%张利嵩%彭杰
李旭東%張楊%張利嵩%彭傑
리욱동%장양%장리숭%팽걸
钝舵%气动热环境%斜激波系%激波/边界层干扰%电弧加热器
鈍舵%氣動熱環境%斜激波繫%激波/邊界層榦擾%電弧加熱器
둔타%기동열배경%사격파계%격파/변계층간우%전호가열기
Blunt-fin%Aerodynamic heating%Oblique shockwave%Shockwave/boundary layer interaction%Arcjet facilities
采用计算流体动力学(CFD)方法模拟钝舵在电弧加热试验中的流场和气动热环境,分析不同来流状态下舵周围流场的特征,以及对应的舵前缘和侧面热流分布规律,并与试验结果进行对比。当仅存在舵前缘斜激波时,计算结果和试验结果符合较好,根据流场分析结果解释了舵前缘多个局部高热流区和侧面三角形低热流区的成因机理:当喷管出口出现斜激波系时,出现斜激波系与舵前缘边界层的相互干扰,导致干扰区热流变高,从而改变舵前缘热流分布规律。但是由于测量手段的限制,某些流场特征无法在试验结果中体现,导致计算结果和试验结果不完全符合。
採用計算流體動力學(CFD)方法模擬鈍舵在電弧加熱試驗中的流場和氣動熱環境,分析不同來流狀態下舵週圍流場的特徵,以及對應的舵前緣和側麵熱流分佈規律,併與試驗結果進行對比。噹僅存在舵前緣斜激波時,計算結果和試驗結果符閤較好,根據流場分析結果解釋瞭舵前緣多箇跼部高熱流區和側麵三角形低熱流區的成因機理:噹噴管齣口齣現斜激波繫時,齣現斜激波繫與舵前緣邊界層的相互榦擾,導緻榦擾區熱流變高,從而改變舵前緣熱流分佈規律。但是由于測量手段的限製,某些流場特徵無法在試驗結果中體現,導緻計算結果和試驗結果不完全符閤。
채용계산류체동역학(CFD)방법모의둔타재전호가열시험중적류장화기동열배경,분석불동래류상태하타주위류장적특정,이급대응적타전연화측면열류분포규률,병여시험결과진행대비。당부존재타전연사격파시,계산결과화시험결과부합교호,근거류장분석결과해석료타전연다개국부고열류구화측면삼각형저열류구적성인궤리:당분관출구출현사격파계시,출현사격파계여타전연변계층적상호간우,도치간우구열류변고,종이개변타전연열류분포규률。단시유우측량수단적한제,모사류장특정무법재시험결과중체현,도치계산결과화시험결과불완전부합。
The flowfield and aeroheating environment of an blunt-fin in an arcjet heating condition is simulated with computational fluid dynamics(CFD) method in this paper. the characteristic of surrounding flowfield under different experiment condition was analyzed as well as the corresponding surface heat flux on fin front and sidewall. A comparison was conducted between computational result and experiment. When there’s only a single oblique shockwave on fin front, the computation result meets the experiment well. There exist several high-heatflux spots on the front and a triangular area of low heatflux in this case. The mechanism of this distribution was explained by flowfield analysis result. But when oblique shockwaves occur at the nozzle exit, the reflected shockwave interacts with boundary layer which caused very high aeroheating at the interaction spot. But restricted to the measurement devices, the shockwave/boundary layer interaction features cannot be reflected in the experiment result, so the computation results are not coincident with the experiment.