CAJ | 학술논문

重商主义是经济思想史上最为悠久和影响最大的一种思潮，但理论界对其看法其实存在严重分歧，斯密、施莫勒和熊彼特分别代表了三种截然不同的评价。一百多年来围绕重商主义展开的争论集中在“什么是重商主义”、“重商主义成功了吗”以及“斯密是重商主义的对立面吗”等三个主题。重商主义本身的二重性、定义的混乱、方法论的差异和立场的对立等，都是导致出现争论的原因。后续研究应在细化范围、明确概念、加强原始文本阅读和历史重建方法应用等方面有所深化。
중상주의시경제사상사상최위유구화영향최대적일충사조，단이론계대기간법기실존재엄중분기，사밀、시막륵화웅피특분별대표료삼충절연불동적평개。일백다년래위요중상주의전개적쟁론집중재“십요시중상주의”、“중상주의성공료마”이급“사밀시중상주의적대립면마”등삼개주제。중상주의본신적이중성、정의적혼란、방법론적차이화립장적대립등，도시도치출현쟁론적원인。후속연구응재세화범위、명학개념、가강원시문본열독화역사중건방법응용등방면유소심화。
Mercantilism is one of the oldest and the most influential ideological trend in history of econom-ic thought , but theorists ’ s evaluations are very different .Adam Smith , Gustav Schmoller and Joseph Schumpeter represented three different opinions .“What is Mercantilism”,“Is it successful”and“Is Ad-am Smith the opposite of Mercantilism” are three debate more than one hundred years .The duality of Mercantilism , confused definition , different methodology and standpoint are main reasons .Subsequent research should refine the scope , clarify concepts , strengthen original -text reading and historical con-struction .