天津法学
天津法學
천진법학
JOURNAL OF TIANJIN ADMINISTRATIVE INSTITUTE OF POLITICAL SCIENCE & LAW
2013年
4期
72-78
,共7页
羁押例外%审查主体%审查标准%运行机制
羈押例外%審查主體%審查標準%運行機製
기압예외%심사주체%심사표준%운행궤제
exception to detention%review entity%review standards%operating mechanism
新《刑事诉讼法》通过设立羁押必要性审查制度来降低我国目前高居不下的审前羁押率,但关于羁押必要性审查的具体工作机制,新《刑事诉讼法》和新《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则(试行)》均没有进行规定。文章从羁押必要性审查制度在我国刑事司法中的独特效用价值入手,分别从审查主体、审查标准、审查程序等方面对羁押必要性审查机制进行阐述。在审查主体方面提出了将羁押必要性的评估与审查分开,将依职权审查与依申请审查分开处理的解决路径,并提出了详细的羁押必要性审查评估内容与标准体系,分别从启动程序、评估程序、决定程序、救济程序等方面对羁押必要性审查运行机制进行探讨,试图构建可行性与统一性较强的羁押必要性审查工作机制。。
新《刑事訴訟法》通過設立羈押必要性審查製度來降低我國目前高居不下的審前羈押率,但關于羈押必要性審查的具體工作機製,新《刑事訴訟法》和新《人民檢察院刑事訴訟規則(試行)》均沒有進行規定。文章從羈押必要性審查製度在我國刑事司法中的獨特效用價值入手,分彆從審查主體、審查標準、審查程序等方麵對羈押必要性審查機製進行闡述。在審查主體方麵提齣瞭將羈押必要性的評估與審查分開,將依職權審查與依申請審查分開處理的解決路徑,併提齣瞭詳細的羈押必要性審查評估內容與標準體繫,分彆從啟動程序、評估程序、決定程序、救濟程序等方麵對羈押必要性審查運行機製進行探討,試圖構建可行性與統一性較彊的羈押必要性審查工作機製。。
신《형사소송법》통과설립기압필요성심사제도래강저아국목전고거불하적심전기압솔,단관우기압필요성심사적구체공작궤제,신《형사소송법》화신《인민검찰원형사소송규칙(시행)》균몰유진행규정。문장종기압필요성심사제도재아국형사사법중적독특효용개치입수,분별종심사주체、심사표준、심사정서등방면대기압필요성심사궤제진행천술。재심사주체방면제출료장기압필요성적평고여심사분개,장의직권심사여의신청심사분개처리적해결로경,병제출료상세적기압필요성심사평고내용여표준체계,분별종계동정서、평고정서、결정정서、구제정서등방면대기압필요성심사운행궤제진행탐토,시도구건가행성여통일성교강적기압필요성심사공작궤제。。
By setting up the detention necessity review mechanism, the new Criminal Procedure Law is now trying to reduce the persistently high rate of pre-trial detention in China. But neither the new Criminal Proce-dure Law nor Criminal Procedure Rules for People's Procuratorates (for Trial Implementation) has regulated the specific working mechanism on the detention necessity review mechanism. Starting from the research on the specific value of detention necessity review mechanism in China's Criminal Justice, the authors made ex-ploration on the analysis of the construction of the mechanism from such aspects as reviewing entity, standard and procedure. In the reviewing entity, the authors tried to separate the assessment and the review of the de-tention necessity, and provided separate solution path for ex officio review and review upon application, and proposed detailed content of detention necessity assessment and standards. They also provided possible design of the system of review of the detention necessity, from the aspects of launch of the procedure, assessment pro-cedure, decision-making procedure and relief procedure and tried to construct a unified and feasible detention necessity review mechanism.