化学分析计量
化學分析計量
화학분석계량
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS AND METERAGE
2013年
6期
43-45
,共3页
王立卫%闫正%邢超%郭莎%叶玲菊%李彦平
王立衛%閆正%邢超%郭莎%葉玲菊%李彥平
왕립위%염정%형초%곽사%협령국%리언평
高效毛细管电泳法%苋菜红%亮蓝%葡萄酒
高效毛細管電泳法%莧菜紅%亮藍%葡萄酒
고효모세관전영법%현채홍%량람%포도주
high performance capillary electrophoresis%amaranth%brilliant blue%wine
建立了高效毛细管电泳法直接分离测定葡萄酒中苋菜红及亮蓝的方法。研究了缓冲体系种类、pH值、缓冲溶液浓度及有机添加剂对分离效果的影响。确定的最佳实验条件:未涂层石英毛细管柱(50 cm×75μm),分离缓冲溶液10 mmol/L柠檬酸-5 mmol/Lβ-环糊精(pH 2.6),检测波长220 nm,电泳电压20 kV,压力进样(20 kPa×3 s),电泳温度为室温。该方法测定的苋菜红及亮蓝质量浓度在2~200 mg/L范围内线性良好,苋菜红及亮蓝的检出限分别为0.58,0.50 mg/L,线性相关系数r2≥0.9994,回收率在93.9%~107.2%之间。该方法无需样品预处理,操作简便,测定准确,能满足实际样品的分析需求。
建立瞭高效毛細管電泳法直接分離測定葡萄酒中莧菜紅及亮藍的方法。研究瞭緩遲體繫種類、pH值、緩遲溶液濃度及有機添加劑對分離效果的影響。確定的最佳實驗條件:未塗層石英毛細管柱(50 cm×75μm),分離緩遲溶液10 mmol/L檸檬痠-5 mmol/Lβ-環糊精(pH 2.6),檢測波長220 nm,電泳電壓20 kV,壓力進樣(20 kPa×3 s),電泳溫度為室溫。該方法測定的莧菜紅及亮藍質量濃度在2~200 mg/L範圍內線性良好,莧菜紅及亮藍的檢齣限分彆為0.58,0.50 mg/L,線性相關繫數r2≥0.9994,迴收率在93.9%~107.2%之間。該方法無需樣品預處理,操作簡便,測定準確,能滿足實際樣品的分析需求。
건립료고효모세관전영법직접분리측정포도주중현채홍급량람적방법。연구료완충체계충류、pH치、완충용액농도급유궤첨가제대분리효과적영향。학정적최가실험조건:미도층석영모세관주(50 cm×75μm),분리완충용액10 mmol/L저몽산-5 mmol/Lβ-배호정(pH 2.6),검측파장220 nm,전영전압20 kV,압력진양(20 kPa×3 s),전영온도위실온。해방법측정적현채홍급량람질량농도재2~200 mg/L범위내선성량호,현채홍급량람적검출한분별위0.58,0.50 mg/L,선성상관계수r2≥0.9994,회수솔재93.9%~107.2%지간。해방법무수양품예처리,조작간편,측정준학,능만족실제양품적분석수구。
A method by using high performance capillary electrophoretic for the direct determination of amaranth and brilliant blue in wine was developed. The effects of different buffer types, pH and concentration of running buffer and or-ganic additives on the separation were investigated. A 50 cm×75μm uncoated capillary was used with 10 mmol/L citric acid and 5 mmol/L beta-cyclodextrin (pH 2.6) as separation buffer. The detection wavelength was set at 220 nm, and the run voltage was 20 kV. The injection time was 3 s at 20 kPa and the temperature was at room temperature. The linear rela-tionship between the mass concentration of the amaranth and brilliant blue was obtained in the concentration range of 2-200 mg/L. The limits of detection were 0.58 and 0.50 mg/L for amaranth and brilliant blue, respectively. Their correlation coefficients were not less than 0.999 4. The recoveries were between 93.9%and 107.2%. There was no sample pretreatment in the method. The results showed that the method is simple, accurate, and suitable for the determination of real samples.