中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2013年
11期
1088-1091
,共4页
李崎%林静%肖红%马尔丽%梁鹏%石庭伟%方利群%罗朝志%刘进
李崎%林靜%肖紅%馬爾麗%樑鵬%石庭偉%方利群%囉朝誌%劉進
리기%림정%초홍%마이려%량붕%석정위%방리군%라조지%류진
基本生命支持%模拟教学%形成性评估
基本生命支持%模擬教學%形成性評估
기본생명지지%모의교학%형성성평고
Basic life support%Simulation-based medical education%Formative assessment
目的:观察形成性评估对医学生学习基本生命支持(basic life support, BLS)技能的影响。方法206名医学生随机分入对照组(C组,100人)与试验组(F组,106人)。BLS理论课后,C组接受45 min技能培训,培训结束后接受BLS技能评估(培训后评估)。而F组在培训前先接受BLS技能评估(一种形成性评估);之后,依据其在培训前评估中的操作给予15 min反馈,随后进行30 min BLS技能培训。培训结束后F组再次接受BLS技能评估。两组培训后技能评估平均成绩采用Student's-t-test进行比较,P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。结果培训后评估中F组成绩(85.2±7.3)分优于C组(68.2±13.2)分,差异有统计学意义(P=0.00)。结论形成性评估可以显著提高医学生BLS技能培训成绩。
目的:觀察形成性評估對醫學生學習基本生命支持(basic life support, BLS)技能的影響。方法206名醫學生隨機分入對照組(C組,100人)與試驗組(F組,106人)。BLS理論課後,C組接受45 min技能培訓,培訓結束後接受BLS技能評估(培訓後評估)。而F組在培訓前先接受BLS技能評估(一種形成性評估);之後,依據其在培訓前評估中的操作給予15 min反饋,隨後進行30 min BLS技能培訓。培訓結束後F組再次接受BLS技能評估。兩組培訓後技能評估平均成績採用Student's-t-test進行比較,P<0.05錶示差異有統計學意義。結果培訓後評估中F組成績(85.2±7.3)分優于C組(68.2±13.2)分,差異有統計學意義(P=0.00)。結論形成性評估可以顯著提高醫學生BLS技能培訓成績。
목적:관찰형성성평고대의학생학습기본생명지지(basic life support, BLS)기능적영향。방법206명의학생수궤분입대조조(C조,100인)여시험조(F조,106인)。BLS이론과후,C조접수45 min기능배훈,배훈결속후접수BLS기능평고(배훈후평고)。이F조재배훈전선접수BLS기능평고(일충형성성평고);지후,의거기재배훈전평고중적조작급여15 min반궤,수후진행30 min BLS기능배훈。배훈결속후F조재차접수BLS기능평고。량조배훈후기능평고평균성적채용Student's-t-test진행비교,P<0.05표시차이유통계학의의。결과배훈후평고중F조성적(85.2±7.3)분우우C조(68.2±13.2)분,차이유통계학의의(P=0.00)。결론형성성평고가이현저제고의학생BLS기능배훈성적。
Objective To investigate the effect of formative assessment on skill acquisition of basic life support (BLS) among medical students. Methods Totally 206 undergraduates were ran-domized into control group (C group) and interventional group (F group). A BLS lecture was given in both groups. And then, 45 min BLS training and BLS skill assessment (after training) were given in C group. Undergraduates in F group received BLS skill assessment (formative assessment) before training, and 15 min feedback was delivered based on the assessment, then 30 min BLS training was conducted. Skills assessment was conducted again in F group after the training. Student's-t-test was used to compare the difference of skills between the two groups and P<0.05 signifies statistically sig-nificant differences. Results Score of F group (85.2±7.3) were higher than that in C group (68.2± 13.2), with statistical difference. Conclusion A formative assessment could significantly improve skill acquisition of BLS among medical students.