世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版)
世界最新醫學信息文摘(電子版)
세계최신의학신식문적(전자판)
World Latest Medicine Information
2013年
20期
23-24,26
,共3页
周永静%肖明%满昌峰%范钰
週永靜%肖明%滿昌峰%範鈺
주영정%초명%만창봉%범옥
替吉奥%联合化疗%晚期胃癌
替吉奧%聯閤化療%晚期胃癌
체길오%연합화료%만기위암
S-1%Combination chemotherapy%Advanced gastric cancer
目的:观察替吉奥联合伊力替康、多西紫杉醇等化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析晚期胃癌患者43例,分为两组:每组替吉奥的剂量均根据体表面积来确定初始剂量,体表面积<1.25m2,替吉奥40mg/次,2次/日;体表面积1.25~1.5m2,替吉奥50mg/次,2次/日;体表面积>1.5m2,替吉奥60mg/次,2次/日,早、晚饭后口服,连续服用14天,停药7天。A 组20例:替吉奥+紫杉醇+伊力替康(紫杉醇90mg /m2,静脉滴注3小时,第1、8天,伊力替康180mg/m2,静脉滴注90分钟,第2,9天)。B 组23例:替吉奥+多西紫杉醇+奥沙利铂(多西紫杉醇60mg /m2,静脉滴注1小时,第1,8天,奥沙利铂130 mg /m2,静脉滴注3小时,第2,9天);每组均21天为一周期,两个周期后评价疗效,每周期评价毒副反应。结果全部患者均可评价疗效,无治疗相关性死亡事件发生。两组客观有效率(ORR)分别为:50.0%(10/20),52.3%(11/23);疾病控制率( DCR)分别为:85.0%(17/20),86.9%(20/23)。不良反应主要是骨髓抑制,胃肠道反应及外周神经毒性。结论替吉奥联合伊力替康、多西紫杉醇等化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效较高,毒副反应较轻,多数患者耐受性良好,值得扩大样本进一步研究。
目的:觀察替吉奧聯閤伊力替康、多西紫杉醇等化療方案治療晚期胃癌的療效及安全性。方法迴顧性分析晚期胃癌患者43例,分為兩組:每組替吉奧的劑量均根據體錶麵積來確定初始劑量,體錶麵積<1.25m2,替吉奧40mg/次,2次/日;體錶麵積1.25~1.5m2,替吉奧50mg/次,2次/日;體錶麵積>1.5m2,替吉奧60mg/次,2次/日,早、晚飯後口服,連續服用14天,停藥7天。A 組20例:替吉奧+紫杉醇+伊力替康(紫杉醇90mg /m2,靜脈滴註3小時,第1、8天,伊力替康180mg/m2,靜脈滴註90分鐘,第2,9天)。B 組23例:替吉奧+多西紫杉醇+奧沙利鉑(多西紫杉醇60mg /m2,靜脈滴註1小時,第1,8天,奧沙利鉑130 mg /m2,靜脈滴註3小時,第2,9天);每組均21天為一週期,兩箇週期後評價療效,每週期評價毒副反應。結果全部患者均可評價療效,無治療相關性死亡事件髮生。兩組客觀有效率(ORR)分彆為:50.0%(10/20),52.3%(11/23);疾病控製率( DCR)分彆為:85.0%(17/20),86.9%(20/23)。不良反應主要是骨髓抑製,胃腸道反應及外週神經毒性。結論替吉奧聯閤伊力替康、多西紫杉醇等化療方案治療晚期胃癌療效較高,毒副反應較輕,多數患者耐受性良好,值得擴大樣本進一步研究。
목적:관찰체길오연합이력체강、다서자삼순등화료방안치료만기위암적료효급안전성。방법회고성분석만기위암환자43례,분위량조:매조체길오적제량균근거체표면적래학정초시제량,체표면적<1.25m2,체길오40mg/차,2차/일;체표면적1.25~1.5m2,체길오50mg/차,2차/일;체표면적>1.5m2,체길오60mg/차,2차/일,조、만반후구복,련속복용14천,정약7천。A 조20례:체길오+자삼순+이력체강(자삼순90mg /m2,정맥적주3소시,제1、8천,이력체강180mg/m2,정맥적주90분종,제2,9천)。B 조23례:체길오+다서자삼순+오사리박(다서자삼순60mg /m2,정맥적주1소시,제1,8천,오사리박130 mg /m2,정맥적주3소시,제2,9천);매조균21천위일주기,량개주기후평개료효,매주기평개독부반응。결과전부환자균가평개료효,무치료상관성사망사건발생。량조객관유효솔(ORR)분별위:50.0%(10/20),52.3%(11/23);질병공제솔( DCR)분별위:85.0%(17/20),86.9%(20/23)。불량반응주요시골수억제,위장도반응급외주신경독성。결론체길오연합이력체강、다서자삼순등화료방안치료만기위암료효교고,독부반응교경,다수환자내수성량호,치득확대양본진일보연구。
Objective To evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of S-1 combined with CPT-11 or Docetaxel、etc on patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Forty-three patients with advanced gastric cancer were divided into two groups:in every group, S-1 was administered based on patients' body surface area: <1.25m2,40mg,bid; 1.25~1.5m2, 50mg, bid; >1.5m2, 60mg, bid,d1- 14. group A with 20 patients(S-1 + PTX + CPT-11, PTX 90mg/m2 iv,d1,8; CPT-11 180mg/m2 iv,d2,9),group B with 23patients(S-1 + DTX + L-OHP,DTX 60mg /m2 iv,d1,8;L-OHP 130mg/m2 iv,d2,9). Twenty-one days was a cycle. The evaluation of efficacy and toxicity was performed after 2courses. Results The overall response rates (ORR) were50.0%(10/20),52.3%(11/23); and the disease control rate(DCR)were 85.0%(17/20),86.9%(20/23), respectively. The major toxicities included leucopenia,nause,vomiting and neurosensory abnormity. No occurrence of treatment related deaths was observed. Conclusion The regimen of S-1 combined with CPT-11 or Docetaxel、etc is effective and tolerable in toxic effects for patients with advanced gastric cancer, which is worth being further studied in the future in clinic.