检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE AND CLINICAL SCIENCES
2013年
24期
3318-3319
,共2页
干化学法%参考区间%血糖%相关分析%湿化学法
榦化學法%參攷區間%血糖%相關分析%濕化學法
간화학법%삼고구간%혈당%상관분석%습화학법
dry chemical analysis%reference interval%blood sugar%correlation analysis%liquid chemi-cal method
目的:分析干化学法和湿化学法测定血糖的相关程度,探讨两种方法能否共用同一参考区间,保持检测结果的一致性。方法依据美国临床实验室标准化协会的EP9-A2文件,以ADVIA2400生化仪组成的检测系统作为比较方法,以VITROS FS 5.1生化仪组成的检测系统作为实验方法,分析两种方法之间的相关性,换算所得直线回归方程的斜率、截距作为干化学仪的校正参数,再重复测定血糖,分析参数改变前后两种方法的相关性和临床可接受性。结果参数改变前,两种方法检测血糖相关性很好,相关系数 r2=0.9995,但是不同医学决定水平的系统误差均大于允许偏差(EA)的1/2,校正参数后,两种方法检测血糖 r2=0.9997,SE均小于EA 的1/2。结论干化学法和湿化学法测定血糖浓度相关性良好,通过校正参数后可共用同一参考区间,其检测结果临床可接受。
目的:分析榦化學法和濕化學法測定血糖的相關程度,探討兩種方法能否共用同一參攷區間,保持檢測結果的一緻性。方法依據美國臨床實驗室標準化協會的EP9-A2文件,以ADVIA2400生化儀組成的檢測繫統作為比較方法,以VITROS FS 5.1生化儀組成的檢測繫統作為實驗方法,分析兩種方法之間的相關性,換算所得直線迴歸方程的斜率、截距作為榦化學儀的校正參數,再重複測定血糖,分析參數改變前後兩種方法的相關性和臨床可接受性。結果參數改變前,兩種方法檢測血糖相關性很好,相關繫數 r2=0.9995,但是不同醫學決定水平的繫統誤差均大于允許偏差(EA)的1/2,校正參數後,兩種方法檢測血糖 r2=0.9997,SE均小于EA 的1/2。結論榦化學法和濕化學法測定血糖濃度相關性良好,通過校正參數後可共用同一參攷區間,其檢測結果臨床可接受。
목적:분석간화학법화습화학법측정혈당적상관정도,탐토량충방법능부공용동일삼고구간,보지검측결과적일치성。방법의거미국림상실험실표준화협회적EP9-A2문건,이ADVIA2400생화의조성적검측계통작위비교방법,이VITROS FS 5.1생화의조성적검측계통작위실험방법,분석량충방법지간적상관성,환산소득직선회귀방정적사솔、절거작위간화학의적교정삼수,재중복측정혈당,분석삼수개변전후량충방법적상관성화림상가접수성。결과삼수개변전,량충방법검측혈당상관성흔호,상관계수 r2=0.9995,단시불동의학결정수평적계통오차균대우윤허편차(EA)적1/2,교정삼수후,량충방법검측혈당 r2=0.9997,SE균소우EA 적1/2。결론간화학법화습화학법측정혈당농도상관성량호,통과교정삼수후가공용동일삼고구간,기검측결과림상가접수。
Objective To study the correlation of blood glucose results by dry chemical and liquid chemical a-nalysis ,explore whether these two methods can share a reference interval ,while keep the result consistency . Methods According to EP9-A document request of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory of Standards ,the comparative method(X) was ADVIA2400 ,VITROS FS 5 .1 examination method(Y) ,analyze the correlation between the two methods .Detected the blood sugar level again by these two methods after the dry chemical analysis parame-ters were changed .Results Before changes in the parameters ,the blood sugar level by the two methods correlated well(r2 =0 .999 5) ,however the expected bias(SE) of the different Medicine decide level was greater than the allowa-ble deviation (EA/2 ) .After parameters calibration ,these two methods of blood sugar correlated well too ( r2 =0 .999 7) ,SE was less than EA/2 .Conclusion Dry chemical and liquid chemical analysis have good correlation in blood sugar concentration ,they can share the same reference interval after parameters calibration ,which can be re-ceived in clinic .