国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
14期
2139-2142
,共4页
前列腺癌%磁共振弥散加权成像DWI%动态增强扫描
前列腺癌%磁共振瀰散加權成像DWI%動態增彊掃描
전렬선암%자공진미산가권성상DWI%동태증강소묘
Prostate cancer%Magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging DWI%Dynamic contrast-enhanced scan
目的 研究分析磁共振弥散加权成像DWI及动态增强扫描对前列腺癌患者的诊断价值.方法 选择我院收治的经病理学检查确诊为前列腺癌的患者40例作为研究对象,对所有患者进行磁共振弥散加权成像DWI检查及动态增强扫描,并与病理学检查结果对比,分析其临床诊断效果.结果 前列腺癌患者的ADC为(0.81±0.09),最大强化率为(138.98±36.34),1 min强化率为(132.87±35.35),2 min强化率为(133.09±41.21),流出分数为(17.72±7.88).与病理学检查诊断结果对比,2种检查方法对前列腺癌的检出率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 使用磁共振弥散加权成像DWI及动态增强扫描诊断前列腺癌效果较为理想,与病理学诊断较为接近,可以在临床上推广应用.
目的 研究分析磁共振瀰散加權成像DWI及動態增彊掃描對前列腺癌患者的診斷價值.方法 選擇我院收治的經病理學檢查確診為前列腺癌的患者40例作為研究對象,對所有患者進行磁共振瀰散加權成像DWI檢查及動態增彊掃描,併與病理學檢查結果對比,分析其臨床診斷效果.結果 前列腺癌患者的ADC為(0.81±0.09),最大彊化率為(138.98±36.34),1 min彊化率為(132.87±35.35),2 min彊化率為(133.09±41.21),流齣分數為(17.72±7.88).與病理學檢查診斷結果對比,2種檢查方法對前列腺癌的檢齣率差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05).結論 使用磁共振瀰散加權成像DWI及動態增彊掃描診斷前列腺癌效果較為理想,與病理學診斷較為接近,可以在臨床上推廣應用.
목적 연구분석자공진미산가권성상DWI급동태증강소묘대전렬선암환자적진단개치.방법 선택아원수치적경병이학검사학진위전렬선암적환자40례작위연구대상,대소유환자진행자공진미산가권성상DWI검사급동태증강소묘,병여병이학검사결과대비,분석기림상진단효과.결과 전렬선암환자적ADC위(0.81±0.09),최대강화솔위(138.98±36.34),1 min강화솔위(132.87±35.35),2 min강화솔위(133.09±41.21),류출분수위(17.72±7.88).여병이학검사진단결과대비,2충검사방법대전렬선암적검출솔차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).결론 사용자공진미산가권성상DWI급동태증강소묘진단전렬선암효과교위이상,여병이학진단교위접근,가이재림상상추엄응용.
Objective To study the value of magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced scan in the diagnosis of patients with prostate cancer.Methods 40 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were selected from our hospital as study objects.All the patients underwent diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced scanning.The results were compared with pathological results.Its clinical effect was analyed.Results The patients ADC was (0.81 ± 0.09).The maximum enhancement rate was (138.98 ± 36.34).The 1 minutes enhancement rate was (132.87 ± 35.35).The 2 minutes enhancement rate was (133.09 ± 41.21).The outflow fraction was (17.72 ± 7.88).There was no statistical difference in diagnosing prostate cancer between these 2 methods(P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging DWI and dynamic contrast-enhanced scan in the diagnosis of patients with prostate cancer is effective.Its diagnostic value is as much the same as pathological diagnosis'.It should be clinically generalized.
