CAJ | 학술논문

环境正义一词近来相当流行。就在人们朗朗上口地主张要追求环境正义之际,大家对这个词所指为何,却一直没有共识。每当有环境正义议题出现时,议题周边总是不乏各路诠释者,他们常强调自己对该词的诠释权,并把自身的解释当成某种通说、甚至是＂正解＂。本文认为,环境正义是个典型的＂具有根本争议的概念＂。为避免纯粹概念上的争辩,本文主张采取一种形而下的策略,通过实作的讨论来与理论对话。
배경정의일사근래상당류행。취재인문랑랑상구지주장요추구배경정의지제,대가대저개사소지위하,각일직몰유공식。매당유배경정의의제출현시,의제주변총시불핍각로전석자,타문상강조자기대해사적전석권,병파자신적해석당성모충통설、심지시＂정해＂。본문인위,배경정의시개전형적＂구유근본쟁의적개념＂。위피면순수개념상적쟁변,본문주장채취일충형이하적책략,통과실작적토론래여이론대화。
The concept of environmental justice （EJ） has proven to be ever-popular in recent years.However,while more people claim to support this idea,there are deep and persistent problems in its gist.In most cases,there is a variety of meanings employed for EJ in an argument and it seems that these different meanings are often used as a rhetorical tool to fight against each other.It is argued in this paper that EJ epitomizes the spirit of the so-called ＂essentially contested concept＂.Thus,it is simply not sufficient enough to discuss EJ only theoretically but without looking into what it means in practice.We argue that future research requires a down-to-earth approach.