CAJ | 학술논문

监测和提高心血管系统的耐力水平是当前我国高校体育教学的一个重要目标,也是《国家学生体质健康标准》（以下简称《标准》）测试内容的重要组成部分。心血管耐力评价标准使用台阶试验（改良后的哈佛台阶试验）和中跑（1 000m/男,800m/女）,两者在《标准》评价下是同一模块内容,也就是可以进行等同测试。研究的样本采自我国东部的一所综合性大学,使用了平衡样本,样本数N=978,其中男女各489人,将测试结果在《标准》的评价模式下,采用百分制得分计算,然后使用描述性与推论性统计进行分析：男性平均得分中跑75.85±14.886和台阶试验66.34±17.145;女性分别为74.30±15.323和72.35±9.374。独立样本T检验表明,男性在台阶试验上的得分差异性显著（p〈0.05）强于女性在中跑得分上的差异性（p〈0.05）,通过配对样本T检验,我们发现男性在中跑上的得分与在台阶上的得分具有非常显著性差异（p=0.000〈0.01）,女性无显著性差异（P=0.014〉0.01）。实验结果表明：等同测试的项目的台阶试验和中跑在评价标准上并不相同,研究试图在实验数据的基础上运用统计学方法,修订本模块测试标准,为决策者提供参考。
감측화제고심혈관계통적내력수평시당전아국고교체육교학적일개중요목표,야시《국가학생체질건강표준》（이하간칭《표준》）측시내용적중요조성부분。심혈관내력평개표준사용태계시험（개량후적합불태계시험）화중포（1 000m/남,800m/녀）,량자재《표준》평개하시동일모괴내용,야취시가이진행등동측시。연구적양본채자아국동부적일소종합성대학,사용료평형양본,양본수N=978,기중남녀각489인,장측시결과재《표준》적평개모식하,채용백분제득분계산,연후사용묘술성여추론성통계진행분석：남성평균득분중포75.85±14.886화태계시험66.34±17.145;녀성분별위74.30±15.323화72.35±9.374。독립양본T검험표명,남성재태계시험상적득분차이성현저（p〈0.05）강우녀성재중포득분상적차이성（p〈0.05）,통과배대양본T검험,아문발현남성재중포상적득분여재태계상적득분구유비상현저성차이（p=0.000〈0.01）,녀성무현저성차이（P=0.014〉0.01）。실험결과표명：등동측시적항목적태계시험화중포재평개표준상병불상동,연구시도재실험수거적기출상운용통계학방법,수정본모괴측시표준,위결책자제공삼고。
Improving and monitoring student cardiovascular endurance is an important goal for college physical education in China（National Physical Health Standards for Students,2007）.This study examined the cardiovascular endurance assessment criteria using Harvard Step Test（HST） and Running Tests（RT;1,000/800 meters for males/females）,both selected by NPHSS as equivalent optional tests.A balanced sample（N=978） including 489 females from a comprehensive university in eastern China completed the HST and RT in physical education within two weeks.Both tests were administered using the standardized procedures described in NPHSS,and subsequently the test scores were converted into percentile scores according to NPHSS（2007）.We analyzed the percentile scores using descriptive and inferential statistics.On average,males scored 75.85±14.886 in HST,and 66.34±17.145 in RT;females scored 74.30±15.323 in HST,and 72.35±9.374 in RT,respectively.Independent sample T test showed that males scored significantly higher in HST（p0.05） but lower in RT（p0.05） than females.When comparing the percentile scores between HST and RT within the same sex,Paired sample T tests showed there was significant difference in both males and females＇ test cores（p0.05） with RT producing significantly higher percentile scores than HST.The results suggest that even though HST and RT are recommended as equivalent tests in NPHSS,they are not equivalent in that RT generated favoring scores overall for males and HST generating favoring scores.Future studies should further examine these tests,and suggest for standard/test revisions as appropriate.