教育文化论坛
教育文化論罈
교육문화론단
TRIBUNE OF EDUCATION CULTURE
2012年
1期
69-74
,共6页
会话分析%批评话语分析%语言观%方法论
會話分析%批評話語分析%語言觀%方法論
회화분석%비평화어분석%어언관%방법론
conversation analysis%critical discourse analysis%language view%methodology
会话分析和批评话语分析都将自然话语视为对社会的反映,都以话语为媒介考察社会对话语生成的影响,但由于对话语及社会本质的认识不同,二者的方法论也不尽相同。梳理两个流派的异同点可加深对话语社会特性的认识,同时也有助于整合话语分析各流派的理论及研究方法,推动话语研究的深入发展。
會話分析和批評話語分析都將自然話語視為對社會的反映,都以話語為媒介攷察社會對話語生成的影響,但由于對話語及社會本質的認識不同,二者的方法論也不儘相同。梳理兩箇流派的異同點可加深對話語社會特性的認識,同時也有助于整閤話語分析各流派的理論及研究方法,推動話語研究的深入髮展。
회화분석화비평화어분석도장자연화어시위대사회적반영,도이화어위매개고찰사회대화어생성적영향,단유우대화어급사회본질적인식불동,이자적방법론야불진상동。소리량개류파적이동점가가심대화어사회특성적인식,동시야유조우정합화어분석각류파적이론급연구방법,추동화어연구적심입발전。
Conversation analysis and critical discourse analysis both regard natural conversations as the reflection of the society. They both take conversations as the media to examine the effects of society on conversation. However, duo to different attitudes towards conversations and social essence, they apply different methodologies. Examining the similarities and differences of these two methods may enhance our understanding of the social characteristics of conversations. Furthermore, it may benefit the integration of various schools and methodologies in this area and enhance the development of discourse research.
