CAJ | 학술논문

目的：通过比较三伏天灸与中药治疗过敏性鼻炎的疗效差别来明确天灸的作用。方法：将入选的受试者随机分为观察组（天灸组）、对照组（中药组）各40例，观察两组的疗效。结果：观察组总有效率为87．5％，对照组总有效率为67．5％。两组比较有显著性差异。结论：三伏天灸治疗过敏性鼻炎优于中药。
목적：통과비교삼복천구여중약치료과민성비염적료효차별래명학천구적작용。방법：장입선적수시자수궤분위관찰조（천구조）、대조조（중약조）각40례，관찰량조적료효。결과：관찰조총유효솔위87．5％，대조조총유효솔위67．5％。량조비교유현저성차이。결론：삼복천구치료과민성비염우우중약。
Objective:To compare the effect of differences between Dog -day moxibustion and traditional Chi-nese medicine on treating allergic rhinitis .Methods:80 cases were randomly divided into an observation group ( Dog-day moxibustion ) , a control group ( traditional Chinese medicine ) , with 40 cases in each group .Then their effects were observed.Results:The total effective rate was 87.5%in the observation group, but 67.5%in the control group , with a significant difference between two groups .Conclusion:Dog-day moxibustion is supe-rior to traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis .